Testing the TK Tar Baby

[gmeast]

You "&%_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s" are nothing more than a bunch of rabid dogs displaying the worst in Pack Mentality.  You put words in people's mouths.  You will feed off of yourselves until you are gone.  Example: I never referred to the 555 as "useless" ... you guys did yet there you went, inferring that I said that.  At least the world had the opportunity to see this:
"
My apologies to gmeast, my thanks to nfeijo.... and why did it take so long for anyone to check my math and find my error? Especially since I showed my working, it should have been easily spotted."


I bet that's the first time in your life that anyone in the entire world has ever heard the word "apology" come from your mouth.


Have fun with yourselves.  I'm going surfing.  The sun is shining and the waves are breaking nicely.

[mrsean2k]

@gm

The response to discussion of the 555 was couched in appropriate terms. If you feel the sentence was misleading WRT your opinion, you can say so, and I believe you'll see that point accepted, explicitly clarified, and I dare say apologised for if it's something you're particularly sensitive about.

So far you've been treated with nothing but courtesy; it's difficult to see what prompts your grawlix.

[Magluvin]

You "&%_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s" are nothing more than a bunch of rabid dogs displaying the worst in Pack Mentality.  You put words in people's mouths.  You will feed off of yourselves until you are gone.  Example: I never referred to the 555 as "useless" ... you guys did yet there you went, inferring that I said that.

Have fun with yourselves.  I'm going surfing.  The sun is shining and the waves are breaking nicely.

This is what you said GM ....

"My PWM and UCC27322 driver chip takes about 1/4 (or so) the power of the 555 circuit anyway.  Who would want to use the 555? "

Ok,maybe 'useless' was not the best interpretation.

Your evaluation of the 555 being inefficient is simply not true. ;] But you are inferring that others should use something else instead, when in reality, the cmos 555's can be configured to produce a very high quality PWM circuit, with a ton of ways to customize, and can work very efficiently, contrary to your beliefs.

Dont play the Rose card and be stubborn to things you can learn from others. From what we can see, you are many levels above Rose technically. =]  As of late, I see that most people are above her level. It can be detected in most all of her posts. You will see this sooner or later. All you have to do is open your eyes. ;]

Surfing?  East coast (GMeast)? My brother lives in Vero.  Im in Ft laud.  I can tell ya, Yes the sun is shining.  I cant take the heat like I used to. Or maybe Ive never been in this kind of heat. ;]

There were probably good waves earlier this week from Issac.

MaGs

[TinselKoala]

You "&%_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s" are nothing more than a bunch of rabid dogs displaying the worst in Pack Mentality.  You put words in people's mouths.  You will feed off of yourselves until you are gone.  Example: I never referred to the 555 as "useless" ... you guys did yet there you went, inferring that I said that.  At least the world had the opportunity to see this:
"
My apologies to gmeast, my thanks to nfeijo.... and why did it take so long for anyone to check my math and find my error? Especially since I showed my working, it should have been easily spotted."


I bet that's the first time in your life that anyone in the entire world has ever heard the word "apology" come from your mouth.


Have fun with yourselves.  I'm going surfing.  The sun is shining and the waves are breaking nicely.

Well.... there you have it. Insults and disparagement from the holier-than-thou gmeast. Who isn't doing an "exact replication" or even a replication at all... .he's doing something completely different.

He actually has the temerity to criticise ME for CORRECTING MY MISTAKE.... but he conveniently ignores EVERY INSTANCE OF AINSLIE'S UNCORRECTED ERRORS, LIES AND MISREPRESENTATONS.... and to top it off, he actually refers to one of her lies as support for what he's doing: the schematic in the 2009 document.

Hey...gmeast..... you really should be doing your homework. Here's a suggestion: Find out just why that diode suddenly appeared in Ainslie's schematics. Find out who first used a diode there.

And no, you lying idiot GMEAST: I've issued apologies before, in the rare instances when I am shown to be wrong due to a mistake I've made. But.... look back and tell me please, just how long it took before Ainslie acknowledged and apologised for..... AND CORRECTED...... her 555 timer circuit published in 2002. How long did it take for her to acknowledge AND CORRECT the schematics given for the present 5-mosfet circuit? How about her wonderfully creative math? Examples.... uncorrected and unapologised for and misleading examples.... of Ainslie's ridiculous math abound. Not only does she not correct them and revise the conclusions based on them, she CANNOT correct them because she doesn't even grasp the simplest concepts of algebra... or intellectual honesty.

Why does GMEAST dodge the actual questions about his own fiddling: How was the power figure obtained, showing the working and the measurements? What is the actual frequency of the oscillations, and why does the scope give the wrong value? Why do the oscillations not persist as Ainslie claimed they did in her circuit?  Why is he NOT using the timer and components specified? Because they DON'T WORK? Where is Ainslie's correction, retraction and apology for perpetrating this FRAUD -- the Quantum circuit -- on her readers? And even on Gmeast himself, who had to waste his time building a KNOWN INCORRECT circuit to find out for himself, because AINSLIE CONCEALED INFORMATION, even from him......

Can you imagine the furor if it had been ME, publishing that diagram and insisting that it was correct and concealing information that others had found it not to be correct?

But who cares, after all. Gmeast is NOT replicating anything Ainslie has ever done. He's using part of a schematic that she "published" as a lying attempt to make some people believe that she had a circuit that worked, instead of what was ACTUALLY PUBLISHED IN THE ONLY REAL PUBLICATION. And he's using some other components that Ainslie never used nor even heard of: gate drivers and capacitors and etc.

His "work" is irrelevant and his attitude sucks. All he's got is a great pair of blinders, so he doesn't have to look at the huge Polly Parrot and all of her UNCORRECTED and UNAPOLOGISED FOR mistakes, errors, and outright lies.

[mrsean2k]

He seemed to come with his mind made up about the reception he would receive and then acted as if he'd actually received it, as opposed to a handful of polite questions and observations, and on-topic technical questions.


Sadly mistaken if he thinks this reflects badly on anyone  but himself.