Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Yousaidwhat cannot dare to explain why Ainslie's own scope data clearly show her  battery voltage declining in exactly the "classically" expected manner during several sets of trials, while at the same time Ainslie claims that it doesn't.

On April 30, 2011, for example, a series of scopeshots was saved.
SCRN0331 starts at 18:19:06 with a mean voltage of 63.3 volts.
Seven published shots later, in SCRN0355 at 23:54:48, we see a  mean voltage of 62.0 volts. There is a steady decline in voltage over the series. THE BATTERY VOLTAGE HAS DROPPED BY 1.3 VOLTS IN A SINGLE EVENING OF TESTING ... which indicates a severe drain and NO RECHARGE OR PREVENTION OF DISCHARGE.

On April 13, 2011, a series was saved. Many of these were done in a short interval and so don't show the nice steady decline of the April 30th tests.
SCRN0317 was saved at 18:05:04 with the same mean voltage as 0316 of 63.6 v. Over the next twelve minutes, to 18:17:18, a bunch of scopeshots were saved, up to SCRN0329 and SCRN0330... both winding up with a mean voltage of 63.2 volts.

On April 12, 2011, she started at SCRN0304, 63.8 volts at 06:14:49, and finished up at SCRN0316, 63.6 volts, less than 10 minutes later.

The scopeshots are available for inspection here:
http://seani.justemail.net/rosemary_ainslie/

In other words, you can watch Ainslie's batteries discharging in her own data. On the 12th, the batteries started at 63.8 volts and finished at 63.6 volts. On the 13th, the batteries started at 63.6 volts and finished at 63.2 volts. On the 30th (the next recorded test date that I have in the scope data) the batteries started at 63.3 volts and finished at 62.0 volts. So from the 12th of April to the 30th of April, during several sessions of testing, the battery voltage DECREASED from 63.8 volts down to 62.0 volts, as shown in AINSLIE'S OWN DATA, the most reliable of all her data, the mean battery voltage as measured on the LeCroy oscilloscope. A voltage decrease of NEARLY TWO VOLTS, in just three days of testing. And with silver calcium lead acid batteries, that actually indicates a substantially DISCHARGED battery, not one that is at and remaining at a full charge level.

Come on, YOUSAIDWHAT.... explain this away as being consistent with Ainslie's mendacious claims about "no loss of potential" from the battery.

You cannot.

[polln8r]

Just a quick snapshot of some numbers.

[polln8r]

TK,

I've really enjoyed these power transmitter vids of yours:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTFeoJpkYBM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97ogTf3S3r8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnwDh4CsD-c

It's great seeing the different applications (underwater SNM; HHO buoyancy control; Pulse motor driver). The practical uses seem to be endless! Thank you for sharing with us the things that you do.

polln8r

[TinselKoala]

Thanks! I too find the power transmission system fascinating. There are a lot of similar systems on YT, some with very nice construction.
Since my receiver system produces smooth DC power with good current, it will power just about any kind of load you like. I was especially surprised at how well it worked doing straight electrolysis with a spiral copper electrode and a little magnet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS2kehvxB_A
I haven't made this video public because I was so startled that I uttered an expletive that I didn't delete. So you need the link to view it, it doesn't show up on searches on my channel. The spiral electrode with magnet idea comes from... someone we know, and thank.

ETA: I see that DrStiffler has shown a different, capacitively coupled, submerged diode RF system that electrolyzes some water with tiny bubbles output. Wireless... OK. Sure. Even though there are wires, and not much current. I am happy to concede that DrStiffler has shown some electrolysis without directly hooking power wires to his diodes, but rather using a home-made capacitor to couple the RF into them.

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie's a hoot, isn't she?

Claiming that the solid evidence for battery voltage decreasing over trials is IRRELEVANT to her claim that it doesn't, or is somehow in error... more in error than her own use of the same measurements.... even though it's from the numbers in boxes on her superdooper LeCroy Etch-a-Sketch oscilloscope, which never makes an error.

I wonder if she would claim that the same evidence is IRRELEVANT if it indicated battery voltage increasing by the same amount.