Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

May I please have my Overunity Prize now?

[MileHigh]

TK:

I will try to chill.   

Oh my gawd!!!  Call Nature magazine!  Ring up the New York Times!  World saved!!!!!!  The oscilloscope can't lie!!!

Rosie, can I get licensing rights for North and South America?  I already have a factory I swear.  The robots are being programmed as we speak.  This is the Dawning of the Age of Zip-zip-ons!!!  Zip-zip-ons!!!  Zip-onn-onn-onns!!!   

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

May I please have my Overunity Prize now?

Woo-hoo!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GwjfUFyY6M&ob=av2n

[TinselKoala]

TK,

Don't waste your time doing the integration. Most of Rosemary's shots are of an averaged (MEAN) p(t) of the product of those two traces. See the attached as a good example.

Just multiply x number of fine points and take the average. If the result is a significant negative number, you're done. In the attached example (same shot from the paper), the MEAN p(t) is -73.4VV.

Also, remember that you are multiplying DC values, not just the relative p-p values. I mention this, even though I know you are aware of this, because your scope shot does not show the zero line for the "battery" trace.

Happy crunching

Don't forget that in the NERD scope shots, they have NOT divided the CVR voltages by the value of the resistor. So that MEAN p(t) figure of -73.4 VV should actually be (-73.4)/0.25  == -293.6 Watts. I have a feeling that even the NERDs couldn't believe that value.

[poynt99]

I know about the 0.25 division TK I've been at this for quite some time.

I didn't feel it was necessary to mention; negative 74W is sufficient enough negative to see that it is negative. 

Well done on your -43W. Congratulations!. How are we going to divy the prize between you and Rosemary then? Maybe based on the ratio of negative powers?