Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 104 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: poynt99 on April 28, 2012, 10:53:20 AM
TK,

Here is a shot of the FG current and M2 (Q2) Source current. Even though the M2 Source current has a higher negative peak current, the average current of both is about -182mA as shown.

Poynty - here's the thing.  We put our function probe directly on the Gate at Q1 (right) and the terminal (ground?) directly on the Gate at Q2.  Alternatively - we put that ground on the source rail - before the current sensing resistor.

I'm not sure that you're reading the right place with the ground positioning.

Regards,
Rosie

poynt99

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on April 28, 2012, 12:29:02 PM
We put our function probe directly on the Gate at Q1 (right) and the terminal (ground?) directly on the Gate at Q2.
Rosemary,

As do I. The FG connections are the same as in your first paper, but my diagram is drawn differently (I included the parasitic inductance in the Q2 Gate). My Q1 is on the left, but the connections (which is what counts) are the same.
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

MileHigh

Rosemary:

QuotePoynty - here's the thing.  We put our function probe directly on the Gate at Q1 (right) and the terminal (ground?) directly on the Gate at Q2.  Alternatively - we put that ground on the source rail - before the current sensing resistor.

For starters, in order to avoid mass confusion, the right MOSFET, designated as "M2" in the schematic, is modelling what normally has been referred to as the "Q2 array."  Therefore "M1" on the left is modelling what has normally been referred to as "Q1."  I wish that everybody would stick to this terminology.

More precisely, what are you trying to measure?  You mention two measurements without stating what you are trying to measure and both of them look highly suspect.  But before commenting further please explain what you are trying to measure.

You have this horrible habit of not providing all of the required information when discussing circuits and measurements.  Review your prose before you post it and resolve the ambiguities.

Also, I can't tell you how many times we have read you making reference to (presumably) DC current passing through the gate input of a MOSFET.  This is annoying and tedious in the extreme.  One more nonsensical reference from you about DC current flowing through the gate input of a MOSFET and I will let you know in no uncertain terms.

All that being said, please make a new posting where you clearly describe what you are trying to measure and precisely where you place both terminals of your probe.

Also, use nomenclature that makes sense and is not ambiguous.  For example, for a battery you never say the "source" or the "source rail" or the "drain" or the "drain rail."  You say the negative and positive terminals, or the negative and positive rails.  That's just the way it is.  Stop mixing up battery terminology and MOSFET terminology.  You have been at this for years, and it's time for you to demonstrate that you are capable of learning and using the standard terminology that you yourself read every day.

MileHigh


picowatt

.99,

Regarding your sim schematic, is there a reason you chose position 4 instead of position 3 as the ground point?

I would think this would exclude the CSR and its inductance from the M2 feedback network.

PW

TinselKoala

@MH: 70,000 uF, not 700,000 uF. (71,000 actually.)  I wish....


I do have a 1 Farad cap.... at 3.5 volts.

And those "good" ceramics I have there are only 500pF and I only have about 20 of them.

But I'll manage somehow, probably.



So we still are having a lot of trouble getting Ainslie to understand that a Function Generator will provide current and in this circuit does act in series, either adding voltage (in the negative bias mode) or subtracting it (in the positive gate pulse mode) to that of the main battery. When the mosfet(s) are conducting there is a closed circuit for this power to flow, and it has a total DC resistance made up of the load, the battery's ESR, the CVR, the mosfet's Rds at the gate charge level seen, and the function generator's impedance. If this total resistance is on the order of 300 Ohms, with a battery voltage of 48 volts and a FG drive of 10-12 volts..... well, Do the Math (tm RA).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q98QB6HTA6s

8 or 12 views even before I posted a link...... spooky.