Testing the TK Tar Baby

[WilbyInebriated]

the Tar Baby is NOT a NERD RAT replication. Got that? This gives me considerable freedom to experiment, as well as the liberty to apply for the various prizes she has applied for, should I be able to demonstrate battery charging and overunity performance in the Tar Baby device, which is NOT an Ainslie replication.

[picowatt]

TK,

I watched the video.  Too bad the CSR trace was so glitchy.  It looks like a bad probe or probe contact as none of the other traces reflected the glitch.

Any other ideas as to the reason?

PW

[TinselKoala]

TK,

I watched the video.  Too bad the CSR trace was so glitchy.  It looks like a bad probe or probe contact as none of the other traces reflected the glitch.

Any other ideas as to the reason?

PW

Possibly. I've noticed that the thing is more unstable when running on the charge pump inverter. Maybe it needs more filtering. Or you could be right, loose probes. These probes get abused a lot.
Come to think of it... everything gets abused a lot.




Well, you know... TarBaby either IS, or is NOT a "replication" of Ainslie's NERD device.
If it IS NOT, then I've gotten the same indications of overunity performance that she has claimed with the same justification for it, using what is arguably a different circuit and different stimulation. And I'm ready to demonstrate this anywhere anytime right now. Therefore... Tar Baby qualifies as much or more than the Ainslie device, which is not ready for testing.
If it IS a "replication" of Ainslie's NERD device.... well, that's even better...or perhaps even worse.... because...sadly...  using what is arguably the SAME circuit and the same stimulation as Ainslie's, Tar Baby's batteries DO discharge, and therefore it is predicted that Ainslie's will too... which is why she will continue to avoid testing them properly.

Ironic, isn't it? The only way for Ainslie to "debunk the debunker" is to SHOW A DIM BULB TEST or other definitive test where her running batteries show no discharge after a substantial time heating a load. That is the ONLY WAY that my results, along with those of .99 and the others who have worked without credit on this, can be falsified by Ainslie.

Otherwise....  well, Do The Math (tm RA).

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie claims that the battery is "entirely disconnected from the circuit" during the "off" times of her duty cycle when she believes that there is no current flowing and the circuit is oscillating.

Yet.... the mosfets manifestly get warm in this mode of operation, even though she's denied it. If hers don't get warm ................. why are they on massive heatsinks ??? And if they do get warm, what is warming them up ???


Oh.... that's right ............. there are other explanations to be considered, aren't there. Perhaps the zipons are doing it, and it's cold heat, and the heatsinks are there to keep the mosfets from freezing--- they suck heat from the environment.

I can even think of another reason that is even more likely than zipons.

[WilbyInebriated]

If it IS a "replication" of Ainslie's NERD device....

it is not. got that? you said precisely that. i just quoted you...