Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

it is not. got that? you said precisely that. i just quoted you...

Of course it isn't, troll. It doesn't have white pegboard or a dozen clipleads. In your warped mind that makes it not a replication, and my statement proves it to you.


Of course.... after I move the circuit to a piece of white pegboard...er... I mean, after I have some good heat profile data, then maybe I'll change my mind and start claiming that it IS a replication.   Right now... my only claim is what it has been all along: Tar Baby will perform just like NERD in all significant respects, when tested side-by-side by the same methods and analysed in the same way. And I am ready NOW to prove it by sending TB off to anyone Stefan designates, just as soon as I see that Ainslie has done the same.  So get back under your bridge, troll, unless you have something constructive to contribute.

[MileHigh]

TK:

I think that you have done a great job and you have done enough.  There really isn't much more to say.  I have seen a fair number of nonsensical circuits on the forums and this is just another one.

Nothing will stop Rosemary from her quest.  She has never even been able to admit that during her months and months of testing with the NERD team, that apparently nobody even realized that the function generator itself was in the main current loop.  It can get so ridiculous sometimes.

So we are in "Bring it on Rosie" mode.  Whoopie!

MileHigh

[TinselKoala]

This is just too, too hilarious.

Remember when Ains-lie was denying so vehemently that she was "doozydont" on YouTube and denied that she uploaded that demo video, over and over?

Take a look at this, from the comments on "mosfets how do they work" which I just a few minutes ago made public (you needed the specific link to see it before).

Note how even in these comments, she STILL gets the basic info in the video wrong, in addition to more of the same non-understanding of her own circuit's behaviour.

[TinselKoala]

And of course comments are always enabled for my videos. She LIES YET AGAIN about that. But... from this point forward, comments from "doozydont" are no longer allowed.

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg317526/#msg317526

Not only free legal advice but you solicit it with all the finesse of a 5 year old.   I DID NOT POST THAT VIDEO.  IT DOES NOT REPRESENT OUR CLAIMS.  OUR CLAIM IS ONLY RELATED TO THE CLAIMS IN OUR PAPERS.  ALL OTHER WORK IS MERELY RELATED TO THAT CLAIM WHICH IS IN THAT PAPER. No amount of repeated allegation will change this until you manage to PROVE that I made that video publicly accessible.  When you've PROVED this - then LET ME KNOW.   

Well..... the video was posted and made publicly accessible by doozydont. Rosemary now is commenting on my videos as doozydont. 

DO THE MATH.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

This is just too, too hilarious.

Remember when Ains-lie was denying so vehemently that she was "doozydont" on YouTube and denied that she uploaded that demo video, over and over?

Take a look at this, from the comments on "mosfets how do they work" which I just a few minutes ago made public (you needed the specific link to see it before).

Note how even in these comments, she STILL gets the basic info in the video wrong, in addition to more of the same non-understanding of her own circuit's behaviour.

WHERE HAVE I EVER DENIED THIS?