Testing the TK Tar Baby

[mrsean2k]

Rosemary,what level of credentials will it take for you to accept you're incorrect?


TKs "problem" is that he's qualified but anonymous. Mine is that I don't care about anonymity, but my 25+ year old A level isn't going to convince you.


So what level of non-anonymous qualified opinion would?

[TinselKoala]

My dear TK.

Is your refutation now based on a comparison of our technology with your tiselkoil?  Whatever that is?  (snip)

No, Polly, my refutation is based, as it always has been based, on the idea that your measurements and the conclusions you have drawn from them are spurious. And my example of the TinselKoil, whatever that is (did you watch the videos?) is used as a "black box".

If someone (anyone other than me, of course) came to you and said, "let's use your scope to measure my black box" and you found that it had TEN TIMES the "negative mean power" that you found on your NERD device, and then he showed it VAPORIZING COPPER right before your eyes, running on a battery that measured  the same voltage before and after the test.... what would you conclude?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlS2Oxe5sjg

[Groundloop]

TK,

Can you check the attached drawing and see if I got this correct.

GL.

[TinselKoala]

@mrSean2k:
Do you know that RA has frequently accused me of faking things in my videos?
I laugh and laugh and laugh.

[TinselKoala]

@GL: What you've got in the yellow box looks right to me.
You have to be careful though, because sometimes the letter "W" is used to mean WORK instead of WATTS, and of course the units of work are the same as the units of energy, not power. That adds to the confusion. Like the equation that Ainslie has parroted several times out of context and which appears in full context below, where the W means work and not watts.