Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Groundloop]

@GL: What you've got in the yellow box looks right to me.
You have to be careful though, because sometimes the letter "W" is used to mean WORK instead of WATTS, and of course the units of work are the same as the units of energy, not power. That adds to the confusion. Like the equation that Ainslie has copied several times out of context and which appears in full context below, where the W means work and not watts.

TK,

Yes, I know. In the drawing the text states that I'm using Watt.

ADDED:
Shit, I forgot the "PER" in my drawing, well here is the PER used in a different setup. :-)

GL.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And yet everybody posting here appears to endorse ME and not YOU and nobody has come forward to endorse YOU in ... how long? And the whole INTERNET appears to agree with US, Polly, not YOU. Even your own references !

My dear TK

There is NOTHING more entertaining to our readers than the kind of engagement which you and I endure. Your mission is to 'tar' my name and with it our technology.  My mission is to deny you yours.  NOW.  The arena is this forum.  I am the 'victim' and THAT status is MOST DESIRABLE.  Because when our 'audience' witnesses this engagement - then they see me as that rather lonely voice - with your orchestrated entourage doing your very best to scatter hot tar.  It is the forum equivalent of a Roman Arena - peopled with gladiators.  But with the added zest of 1 against MANY.  Specifically one rather hapless and confused old lady against MANY robust and vociferous vigilantes operating from an ENTIRELY immoral and even CRIMINAL platform.  You are NOT required to exercise intellectual honesty.  You are NOT required to reference FACTS.  You can distort history - misquote me as you please - call me names - exercise all that 'CRUELTY' - and enjoy the benefits of an ENTIRELY unmoderated thread - and the odds are that I'll BUCKLE.  It's inevitable. And IF I were heavily supported then we wouldn't have that same level of engagement.  it would be a simple exercise in establishing science by CONSENSUS based on who does or does not support you or me.  I prefer it that I'm a lonely voice.  It makes it way more dramatic.  Let's face it.  I really should have 'caved'  WAY back.  As did MYLOW?

And nor does it really matter what you say.  It doesn't even matter that you are very OBVIOUSLY wrong.  And with you are picowatt and mrsean and FTC and PhiChaser and God knows who's yet to come into this.  But you see my point.  You're all of you nothing but  a whole lot of unnamed faceless nobodies DEDICATED to defeating a well identified rather old woman who is already well into her dotage.  Bullies and spoilsports - to a man.  LOL.  While I, on my own - and against all odds - stand up to you all - alone - and by myself - and in a minority of one.  LOL  One would, under usual circumstances, expect an early demise.  HOWEVER.  God in his wisdom equipped me with a rather excessive amount of self-esteem and enough logic to refute your best efforts.  Nor do I care about your opinion.  Nor do I care about anyone's opinion.  Which also means that your best efforts are IRRELEVANT.  You see this I trust.  Unless you opinions MATTERED to me - they're entirely ineffectual. Which means that your arsenal is VOID.  And all that tar?  It does nothing but parade your lack of intellectual honesty and your criminal preference for calumny and traducement.  Hardly the party that the self-respecting citizen wants to belong to.

Meanwhile - all those readers - and there are many - are THOROUGHLY engaged and THOROUGHLY entertained.  And the subject of that entertainment is our technology.  That is getting the FULL benefit on all your exposure.  I keep telling you.  I'm MOST grateful for this.  And then.  You can do us NO HARM.  We'll CERTAINLY get our 'space in the sun'.  We'll get our 'chance' to argue against you.  And meanwhile - courtesy all your hard work - the NEWS IS SPREADING.  What's still in abeyance - is ONLY the REQUIRED PROOF of our claim.  God forbid that interest would wane before we actually LAUNCH our demos.  That would be entirely COUNTERPRODUCTIVE.  So you serve us all well.  And my pride is well able to survive your best efforts.  Indeed.  It's rather reinforced by the sheer excess of your prodigal criminality and your entire lack of intellectual honesty.

Rosie Pose.   

[TinselKoala]

So that means you'll be showing some tests.... SOON?

Like when your scope gets back from the repair shop? Any day now?

I will be watching and waiting eagerly to see you refute ONE SINGLE POINT THAT I HAVE MADE with experiments, references, citations, or other people in support. 

You cannot.

It's rather reinforced by the sheer excess of your prodigal criminality and your entire lack of intellectual honesty.

One day you will be made to regret that you uttered that little libellous claim, Ainslie, along with the physical threats you have made against me. They are all recorded and you cannot edit my database.

[TinselKoala]

Here's a description of the Ainslie circuit:
A mosfet or mosfet array is switched by a pulse generator, makes resonant oscillations, powers an inductive-resistive load, makes apparently anomalous heat, and appears to put out more power than is used to run it.

A claim of COP of INFINITY is made, without evidence other than instrumental readings. No unusual physical effects are noted except the warming of the load. The main claim is unsupported by any theoretical model except for Ainslie's.

Here's a description of the TinselKoil circuit:
A mosfet or mosfet array is switched by a pulse generator, makes resonant oscillations, powers an inductive-resistive load, makes apparently anomalous heat, and appears to put out more power than is used to run it.

A POWER AMPLIFICATION ratio of some large number is claimed, with instrumental and other physical evidence of extremely high power levels. The main claim is supported by multitudinous independent replications as well as Standard Electronic Physics, that is: Quantum ElectroDynamics.

QED.


Who you gonna call?

[TinselKoala]

Oh.... sorry, I forgot that there IS physical evidence of high power levels in the Ainslie database.

Here it is: (original Ainslie filename, too)