Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 56 Guests are viewing this topic.

poynt99

Quote from: Groundloop on May 19, 2012, 05:19:40 AM
@All,

Did some testing on the oscillation cycle.

TEST OF BIAS CURRENT IN OSCILLATION MODE:

With Q2:
Main Input: 24 Volt @ 0,17 Ampere = 4,98 Watt.
Bias Input: 12 Volt @ 0,17 Ampere = 2,04 Watt.

Hang on a second here GL, something is wrong; check your numbers again for the Main Input calculation.  :o

24V x 0.17A = 4.08W, not 4.98W. I think you mistakenly hit the "9" key instead of the "0" key when you were typing.

So, it holds. 1/3 of the total power is contributed by the FG (in this case with 12V and 24V supplies).
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

Rosemary Ainslie

And HERE Stefan is another MISREPRESENTATION. TK states that...

>> And here is a good time to point out: THERE HAS BEEN NO EVIDENCE AT ALL that shows high heat WITH OSCILLATIONS ONLY. All of the Ainslie data showing high heat in the load has used a bipolar pulse with substantial current evident during the NON OSCILLATION mode: high current flowing through the single Q1, NOT the gang of 4 Q2s, if the schematic in use was the one which Ainslie has repeatedly affirmed is correct.

The final 10 minutes of the 'water to boil test' showed ZERO current flow during the 'on' period of the duty cycle - with the heat at a 'runaway' level that we discontinued the test in the interests of safety.  And at the conclusion of that test had NO need to change any of the MOSFET transistors.

Therefore this statement is yet more evidence of the spin that TK relies on to contradict our claim

Regards,
Rosemary

ADDED
I believe we have changed one MOSFET subsequent to that test.  It occurred after the incident where the batteries caught fire and was not a consequence of any transistor degradation from that 'water to boil' test.

TinselKoala

I've relabeled GL's diagram to correspond with the usages we have been using here.

Could you please check, GL, to see if I've done this correctly? Thanks... I hope you don't mind my edits and that they are correct in making your diagram correspond to mine and Ainslie's.

TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 19, 2012, 12:30:47 PM
And HERE Stefan is another MISREPRESENTATION. TK states that...

>> And here is a good time to point out: THERE HAS BEEN NO EVIDENCE AT ALL that shows high heat WITH OSCILLATIONS ONLY. All of the Ainslie data showing high heat in the load has used a bipolar pulse with substantial current evident during the NON OSCILLATION mode: high current flowing through the single Q1, NOT the gang of 4 Q2s, if the schematic in use was the one which Ainslie has repeatedly affirmed is correct.

The final 10 minutes of the 'water to boil test' showed ZERO current flow during the 'on' period of the duty cycle - with the heat at a 'runaway' level that we discontinued the test in the interests of safety.  And at the conclusion of that test and since that time we have NOT had need to change any of the MOSFET transistors that are still on that same apparatus.

Therefore this statement is yet more evidence of the spin that TK relies on to contradict our claim

Regards,
Rosemary

PROVE IT.

It is impossible for a mosfet that is functioning properly to receive a +10 or +12 volt positive gate drive and NOT turn on and pass current. Stefan knows this and so does everybody else who has ever used a mosfet. Except maybe Ashtweth and Aaron.

You blew a mosfet in that trial and SINCE THEN you have NEVER used a long duty cycle with a 72 volt battery pack and a long ON time for Q1. And I know why and so do your collaborators, even if you don't.

TinselKoala

Quote from: poynt99 on May 19, 2012, 12:14:11 PM
TK,

GL's diagram is essentially the same as mine (attached). He is still calling Q1 "Q2" and vice versa according to Rosemary's First paper diagram though. I've not shown Q1's diode because it has no effect to the measurements in my simulation.

The conclusion from GL's test is this:

The FG contributes power to the circuit, which is half as much power as the battery supply (in this case), while the circuit is in the "negative bias" oscillation mode of operation.

I agree and I thank you both for your work. But can we PLEASE agree on the designations? In the NON-oscillation mode it makes a big difference whether one mosfet or four are carrying the larger DC current, and I still contend that it is this mode that makes the high heat in Ainslie's trials.