Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Groundloop]

I've relabeled GL's diagram to correspond with the usages we have been using here.

Could you please check, GL, to see if I've done this correctly? Thanks... I hope you don't mind my edits and that they are correct in making your diagram correspond to mine and Ainslie's.

TK,

Yes, that is how it is used.

GL.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

THAT SCOPESHOT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A HIGH ENERGY.  IT IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW - NOTWITHSTANDING THE EVIDENCE OF CURRENT DURING THE ON PERIOD OF A DUTY CYCLE - THE COMPUTATIONS OF WATTAGE REMAIN NEGATIVE.

They are all over this thread, shown in your own scopeshots if you would only learn to read them.

YOU ARE GROSSLY MISREPRESENTING OUR WORK.

[TinselKoala]

YOU ALLEGE that I have been lying.  I INTEND GETTING THAT ESTABLISHED IN A COURT OF LAW.  NOT IN SOME KANGAROO COURT OF A FORUM ADJUDICATED BY A BIASED MEMBER WITH A DECLARED AGENDA TO DISPROVE OUR CLAIM ON ANY BASES AT ALL.

AND YOU ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO QUESTION MY COMPETENCE WHEN YOUR OWN IS CLEARLY WANTING.  YOU ARE STILL PRESUMING TO CALCULATE POWER WITH QUIXOTIC UNACCEPTABLE AND NON STANDARD PROTOCOLS

Rose Pose

You are wrong.

SHOW US HOW YOU CALCULATE POWER.

AND SHOW US HOW IT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE WAY MH AND .99 AND I AND THE HYPERPHYSICS SITE AND ALL THE WIKI AND TEXBOOKS DO IT.

Demonstrate your claims, AINSLIE.  You cannot.

And I can and have demonstrated many instances when you have clearly lied and also many cases when what you say is not true, for one reason or another, yet you have not corrected it when pointed out. Many of the things you have said about me are clearly lies.
But the biggest whopper is the "I DID NOT POST THAT VIDEO" whopper. That one is nothing but a baldfaced lie. And then there is the claim of the 25.6 million Joules whopper. YOU ARE A LIAR, AINSLIE and there is ample evidence of it. Almost 2 GB, in fact, in my database.

[TinselKoala]

THAT SCOPESHOT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A HIGH ENERGY.  IT IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW - NOTWITHSTANDING THE EVIDENCE OF CURRENT DURING THE ON PERIOD OF A DUTY CYCLE - THE COMPUTATIONS OF WATTAGE REMAIN NEGATIVE.

YOU ARE GROSSLY MISREPRESENTING OUR WORK.

CAN YOU NOT READ YOUR OWN WORDS?

You are indeed an idiot and a liar.  YOU are misrepresenting MY work and your own as well.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

CAN YOU NOT READ YOUR OWN WORDS?

You are indeed an idiot and a liar.  YOU are misrepresenting MY work and your own as well.

I SPECIFICALLY STATE THAT IT IS NOT THE 80 WATTS THAT I THOUGHT BUT ONLY THE 40 WATTS AT MOST.  40 WATT IS NOT AN EXAMPLE OF HIGH HEAT.  NOR IS THIS SCREENSHOT AN EXAMPLE OF HIGH CURRENT.  YOUR COMPUTATION OF THAT CURRENT FLOW IS WRONG.  NO OTHER WAY TO PUT IT.  JUST WRONG. 

AMENDED FOR CLARITY