Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 95 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

At the very least, this new claim appears to be an admission that the batteries do indeed discharge.

TinselKoala

QuoteYour atrocities against good English and good spelling - are rampant.  Your only defense is that your accents are DELECTABLE.  Which makes your previous conjectures as absurd as your conjecture about the value of the dollar.  It's been erroded somewhat little TK.  Like your credibility.

You are a parody of yourself, Ainslie. I laugh and laugh at you. I don't find "erroded" in my dictionary. Perhaps you meant "eroded", like your team has done. All eroded away, sanded down by the truth and blasted out by facts.

And >It's all been erroded somewhat little TK< is not an English sentence.

TinselKoala

Quote from: picowatt on May 24, 2012, 08:13:00 AM
At the very least, this new claim appears to be an admission that the batteries do indeed discharge.

Maybe somebody explained to her just what her scopeshots actually DO show, now that they can all be seen in one place.

It's pretty hard to deny a current of 5 amps or more during a phase where there are NO oscillations, or to claim that a strong current is being supplied from some place other than THE BATTERIES when the measurements are right there in front of your nose. Like this shot where there is clearly substantial current flowing during the non-oscillating phase, but she denies it in the text.

"Those are the facts."  It's statements like this ... her "Do The Math" and so on... when the "facts" and the "Math" actually don't support her contentions.... that really get me going.

picowatt

TK,

Just imagine how much more difficult it would be to prove that a circuit exceeds a battery's amp hour rating.  Proving/disproving a COP=Infinity is a piece of cake compared to proving exceeding a battey's amp hour rating.

Can a 60 amp hour rated lead acid battery be discharged at a rate that exceeds 60 amp hours?  I should think quite readily.  With the appropriate load profile, 300-600 amp hours would not seem at all unreasonable. 

Without calorimetry and equivalent heat rate and loading, it would seem very difficult to prove. 

As well, I don't believe the rules for the overunity prizes mention exceeding a battey's amp hour rating.

PW

TinselKoala

Here's a particularly nice selection from my database of Ainslie conversations.