Testing the TK Tar Baby

[picowatt]

Fresh prose from the Rose:

Ha ha ha.....  The never ending Rosie dog and pony show.

Oh yes Rosemary, you never bothered to put a multimeter on current measurement in series with the battery to see what was going on in your circuit.  TK did it and the batteries are clearly discharging with current flowing out of the batteries and into the load.  This was all confirmed with the dim bulb test.  Poynt's simulations showed that the batteries were discharging.

You are so full of crap.  This nonsense with you is never going to end.

Willful ignorance.  Willful stupidity.  Willful self-deception.  Willful propagandizing of something that is clearly not true.

MH,

Like I said, shake the etch-a-sketch, hit the reset button, and move on.  That whole post of hers sounds like something from a year ago.  By "conventional analysis" surely she means "her analysis". 

Guess she never figured out why TK needed heatsinks on the 555.

All those measurements by TK, all that sim work by .99.  Would've thought some of it would have sunk in.

This is "willful ignorance" by definition.

Wait 'till someone with even the slightest ability in electronics questions this on the new forum... history repeats...

As you say "Hmmmmmmmzzzzzzz"

PW   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello again MilesHigh

My guess is that you're suffering a severe attack of VERTIGO?  Can't say that I blame you.  It must be ALARMING to see that things are moving on the ground and out of your control. 

Roll on next week and the certain DESTRUCTION of all that spin that poor little TK has tried to manage.  And then there's picowatt's comments that are going to be down the toilet - notwithstanding that rather ponderous attempt at 'authority to comment'.  Then there's our little TK.  ALL THAT WORK.    UP IN SMOKE.  Tough stuff TK.  You need to learn the art of circumspection in your comments.  That way our experts might possibly have taken your comments on board.  It's not as if I didn't warn you.  No self respecting expert will EVER acknowledge reading your thread  - let alone stand in any danger of believing the nonsense that you've been spinning.  Your first mistake was all that CALUMNY.  Your second mistake was those AWFUL videos.  Your third mistake was dismissing the significance of a negative wattage.  Your fourth mistake was the unfortunate choice of thread name.  Your fifth mistake was the immoderate attempts to advise all and sundry that I don't have a clue about the circuit.  And that's just the first 5.  There's at least 6 more - and that's not even including your flaunted disrespect.  You're that 'low' that you don't even realise that decent people won't want to associate with you.  What idiots you all are.  Surely you realised that IF we were published - then that would be the death knell to your 'spin'?  You should have made provision.  Silly little man that you are.

Rosie Posie

May I add - I think FINALLY - there will be a general re-evaluation as to which of the two of us are a LIAR.  It most certainly is NOT me.

- ever rosy.

[mrsean2k]

Rosemary,


Is there a reason you haven't responded to my offer to donate additional funds to Breast Cancer Research:

http://www.overunity.com/12380/paging-rosemarie-ainslies-nerd-team/


It still stands. To recap:

If you publicly make it known that you have no objection to your NERD team self-identifying, I donate. They can choose not to, but the mere fact you publicly say they can self-identify as far as you're concerned means that I donate.

There are additional donations if they actually identify themselves and their qualifications.

And if they debate, without rancour from the skeptic side, why TK's analysis of the DC portion of your own screenshot is not evidence of significant power delivered to the heating element of your circuit, I donate.


You don't pay a penny, and neither do they. I pay, with the simple proviso that you find someone qualified who stands behind the results you claim.


You know my real name, I'm not shy and can easily and publicly be held to account.


Go and read the link, and then give us an answer.


Sean

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,


Is there a reason you haven't responded to my offer to donate additional funds to Breast Cancer Research:

http://www.overunity.com/12380/paging-rosemarie-ainslies-nerd-team/

YES there's a reason they won't come forward.  The mere fact that this thread is UTTERLY ACTIONABLE - FROM BEGINNING TO END.  The fact that the players here - those 'contributors' to these disgusting posts - are UTTERLY immoral and UTTERLY immoderate.  You guys just don't get it.  This forum is becoming a cesspool of really pretentious science with nothing to redeem it by way of good science.  You've got TK's videos that are obscure - badly filmed - badly proved - badly argued.  The best he can manage is innuendo.  Clarity of argument is UTTERLY void.  You've got picowatt rambling through obscure arguments that are bad science precisely because they're badly articulated.  You've got MileHigh indulging in propoganda that would have embarrassed even the best efforts of Russia during the cold war.  You've got TK indulging in invective that properly belongs to the sewer.  No-one would want to associate with this thread.  They only reason I do is because there would otherwise be NO voice of reason. 

In a way you've done us an enormous service.  You've all been that DESPERATE to deny the evidence - that its ended up piquing EVERYONE's curiosity.  I did warn you.  And IF you want to donate to breast cancer - THEN DO SO.  Better yet.  Donate some decent instruments to our poor members that they can PROVE what you're all DENYING.  You're ONLY anxious to prevent this technology from being progressed.  It's patently obvious.  Had there been even a modicum of sincerity in your reach - then you'd have everyone's sympathy.  As it is you've ONLY got their disgust.  And I am NOT talking about those that post here.  I'm talking about those that READ here.

You've grossly misread the effects of this horrible thread.  NO self-respecting person would EVER associate with the likes of you.  It's the silent majority that rules.  ALWAYS.  Not this sad little group of insurgents against scientific evidence.  You've NO IDEA how utterly distasteful you all are.  You're that steeped in your disgusting agenda to deny this new energy that you've lost the plot. 

Rosie Pose.

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie, you are truly a vile and despicable person. Your recent posts show your true lack of character. I have MANY documented instances of your outright lies, your ignorant statements about your circuit, your faulty mishmash concept of power and energy, and your mathematical ignorance and incompetence. I have all these things organized and documented and referenced, mostly by your own words in blog posts and forum posts, and your own data. I can demonstrate to ANYONE, at any time, that you are incompetent, a liar, ignorant, and insulting, uncooperative and arrogant. I can refute many of the claims you've made by direct experiment and demonstration, and I do it in such a manner that ANYONE ELSE can also refute your claims, should they care to do so.

I am eager to see what "your" laboratory will come up with, although I actually doubt that it even exists. I have complete confidence in the results I've posted and I'm quite sure that ANYONE can repeat what I've done and show the same things. They will NOT, however, be able to repeat what you've claimed. A negative mean power... sure, that's easy, and it means nothing except that you are not using standard measurement protocols, as you so often mendaciously claim. Making scope traces like your Figure 3 ..... that's easy too, and some of us know just how it's done.

Your lies are soon to be ONCE AGAIN uncovered, Ainslie, if "your" laboratory is honest. Just as they have always been by anyone who truly tests your circuit. And you continue to be dishonest on your new forum, every time you do NOT correct Ahern's bad math. Of course you cannot correct his math because you don't understand it yourself AND the correct math makes your claims look bad and you yourself look stupid.  But anyone who actually knows how to do it will see those posts, punch their calculators, and just shake their heads and move on. If your laboratory calculates battery capacity in the same manner as Ahern has done.... then I suppose you will get just what you pay for. And you will remain the laughingstock that you are.

And as far as my video demos go.... I see that I did not pitch them at a low enough level for you to understand them. However, I will gladly allow you to show any of them to any "academic" you like, and have them comment on them in public, with some substantive criticism of what I'm showing and how I'm showing it. And then we can compare that to YOUR video, which, while well lit, is total nonsense and bullcrap, even including outright lies about the actual circuit used.