Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

And so it goes.  TK trying to allege he's professional - picowatt pretending to understand anything at all - MileHigh propagandising about anything rather than science - all of them desperate. 

Nice to see that level of anxiety.  If I didn't know better I'd say they're FRANTIC to deny our choice proof of energy efficiency.  Because IF there's no proof as they allege - then WHO WOULD CARE?   LOL

Rosie Pose

FUNCTION GENERATOR CURRENT, Ainslie.
5.9 MEGAJOULES, Ainslie.
Q1, Positive Gate Drive, and Figure 3, AINSLIE.
Ahern's Battery capacity calculations on your forum, AINSLIE.
THE WATER WASN'T ACTUALLY BOILING, Ainslie.

The list goes on and on, but these are just the current issues you are avoiding with your insulting, mendacious posts, AINSLIE.

[picowatt]

And so it goes.  Never addressing issues raised.  Never confirming the explained operation of the circuit.  Never posting anything of significance but only continued denigration of those that disagree with her explanation or claimed mystery regarding the circuit's operation.

And for the record, please show me where I have weighed in on whether or not this circuit improves efficiency.  I have not.

It should, however, be readily apparent to all readers that more people have a better understanding of the operation of the circuit and use of test equipmet than the "inventor".

[TinselKoala]

Yes.

Rosie Pose.

BACK IT UP WITH A REFERENCE, you liar. Show what you are alleging, you liar.

5.9 megaJoules, you fraud. I have reference after reference of your unsupportable claims. You cannot point to a single thing I've said or done that cannot be repeated exactly by anyone. Your claims, on the other hand, are demonstrably fraudulent, and I have demonstrated that over and over again.

THE FUNCTION GENERATOR CURRENT does flow, you ignoramus.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

My dear little TK

I've extrapolated those comments that prove your impeccable professional practices - for the general amusement of our members and readers.

.  WHAT IS THE REFERENCE to this fraud of mine you are alleging, you liar?
.  Just like your laboratory, idiot Little Miss Mosfet,
.  just LIKE YOUR UNNAMED LABORATORY and your phony endorsements
.  You have no grounds to criticise me, you miserable scribbler.
.  You, by claiming prize money based on your bogus claims of overunity and COP INFINITY, are indeed engaging in FRAUD
.  you are trying to profit monetarily from your lies and errors.
.  You have threatened me with physical harm and you are manifestly mentally unstable.
.  I still think you are crazy enough to try to harm me or my property or my family or my employer.
.  My, you are an ignoramus
.  you ignorant person who cannot even operate a calculator correctly,
.  In addition, Ainslie you educationally challenged ignoramus,
.  You are an ignorant, uneducated, arrogant fool
.  Lying hypocrite Ainslie.
.  And that your junk manuscripts contain unsupported claims, distortions, error after error, and outright LIES,
.  Ainslie, lying hypocrite.

... in JUST ONE POST.  LOL 

Guys,

What better proof does anyone need that the man is an arch professional who upholds his oath of professional conduct?      I've said it before.  He's nothing but a silly little man with a HUGE chip on his shoulder.  Like all liars he can't remember what it is that he claimed.  First he's got students and is employed at an academy of sorts.  Then he's got an employer who he's trying to protect.  And a family!  Strange how someone so protective of his own identity is quite so anxious to trash my own.  Notwithstanding all that alleged professionalism. We see the evidence of this here.  Preserved for 'posterity' as he puts is.

Regards,

added 
Rosemary

[TinselKoala]

@PW, .99:
Here's another "challenge" similar to the Altoid demonstrator idea.
With a single mosfet we know that we can make the continual oscillation mode without difficulty. And it's clear that a single mosfet could be properly pulsed in a clean square wave with an arbitrary duty cycle, coming from an onboard oscillator like a simple 555. And we know that the 5-mosfet circuit can be operated in the bipolar mode with both oscillations and pulses using an external source or even the main battery itself with a charge  pump inverter.

But... is it possible to perform both duties with a single mosfet and the main battery only, using an onboard clock, or even external drive from FG? That is, can one lone mosfet be used to make the oscillations while a gate signal is negative and also make the DC ON when the gate signal is positive, duplicating the performance of the NERD circuit using the bipolar gate drive?