Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 85 Guests are viewing this topic.

evolvingape

http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg279934/#msg279934

http://www.overunity.com/12182/testing-the-tk-tar-baby/msg322199/#msg322199

As you can see March 31, 2011 Rosemary reported that diagnostics on her device that was used to generate the scopeshots showed that 2 out of 5 MOSFET's had blown. So definately 1 of the 4 MOSFET's in the Q2 - Q5 array had failed, and either a second in the Q2 - Q5 array or the Q1 MOSFET had also failed.

The scopeshot FIG 3 indicates a FAILED MOSFET according to people skilled in reading oscilloscopes. The evidence points to a data set generated from failed components. This would probably be supported by the large number of additional scopeshots Rosemary has on file if they were made available to the open source community. Despite repeated requests for this raw data the request has never been acknowledged, let alone actioned.

To continue to deny that blown MOSFET's were present in the device is an outright lie, as supported by the inventor's own statement linked too above.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct


mrsean2k

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 23, 2012, 08:54:09 PM
Dear Sean,
Why would I waste time on 'belief'?  When we've got PROOF?  More than 200 individual tests.  More than 360 screen shots.  And between 20 000 and 500 000 x 4 samples per screen shot.  ALL of them measuring COP INFINITY?

Belief, opinion, conjecture, allegation, insinuation .... ALL THAT?  It's only you and TK and his little gang that need such nonsense.   It has NOTHING to do with science.

Kindest regards,
Rosie Pose


The basis of science is replication.


So far all you've offered in your "Open Source" project (a phrase you've consistently bastardized like almost every other) are screenshots and heresay.


Where are your data Rosemary? Where can the data for these tests be downloaded?

MileHigh

Rosemary:

QuoteNOW.  WHAT to do with the setting at the function generator?  Does that put out an AC voltage?  Or a DC voltage?  What we did was set it to DC by default.  It should have been set to AC.

QuoteHAD we applied the correct AC coupling - then the voltage reading would NOT have been 12 volts.  It would have been nearer 6.

I am just highlighting this example of your abysmal heart-sinking sheer stupidity.  It's stupidity in this case because you have no excuse, you have been working with oscilloscopes for years.

In your fantasies about your proposition Rosemary you are "serious" and you have a "thesis" and you have an "experiment" with "measurements."

Yet the quotes above clearly show that you are just a clueless, ignorant, and stupid bungling fool without a clue what you are doing.  And the reason that you are getting a hard time from me because you don't even understand AC coupling vs. DC coupling for an oscilloscope is precisely because of the pretense that you put forward that you are "serious."

Like I said before, you, and your entire proposition is an insult to the disciplines of science and engineering.  You make a mockery of them and expose yourself as an incompetent fool.

You are not fooling anybody and the higher you pretend to position yourself the harder you deserve to be put back in your place.  Your place is behind a table at a Grade Six science fair showing your pulsing coil and nowhere else.

And your pretense where you try to pretend experts like PW are stupid is pathetic, especially when you take in the context as outlined above.

It's just a tragicomic farce at this point in time.  You are NOT ever going to rub shoulders with electrical engineering PhD's Rosemary - the best you can hope for is a pat on the head from a parent visiting your display that you made with your 12-year-old classmate.  That's the level you are at - Grade Six.

You have made a complete fool of yourself and you insult and make a mockery of science and engineering.  Well, science and engineering are fighting back.

MileHigh

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: picowatt on June 24, 2012, 05:13:10 AM

I can verbally put together technical questions that tech type people can understand, so I only phoned and spoke with tech support over the matter.

Apparently you can't.  Or you'd not have been told that there are 12 volts.

Rosie Pose

picowatt

Apparently you are the only one who does not see 12 volts.

But the AC coupling thing, that was truly silly.

You should stop before you dig the hole any deeper.