Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

LOL.  I think you're rather stultified TK.  And I think this is a fair description of you. All round.  You've a choice turn of phrase and a bottomless reach of insult.  Quite amusing.  In its way.  But sadly.  All you EVER do is congratulate yourself.  It's getting a bit boring.  The more so as the rest of us don't see that much cause.

Rosie Pose

You again, bogus claimant? Why aren't you ashamed of yourself? You have been demonstrated to be a liar and incompetent many times over, even by your own pet trolls.
No retraction of your lying 5.9 megaJoules claim has been made. It is STILL UP RIGHT NOW on Rossi's JNP, and I can't find any statement where it has been corrected or retracted. In fact it has been many days since anyone has even commented on your "paper" in Rossi's JNP. Of course you are carrying on your private email correspondence with your sycophants as usual and those aren't normally available to the public. Or are they.....

And no public posting of your original data sets have been made, contrary to your "I can and I have" claim. You cannot, and you have not publicly posted your data for inspection. The data you HAVE posted, in the form of scopeshots, refute your claims utterly and illustrate your mendacious approach to experimentation: you only record and report what you want to see, what supports your contentions, and you do not design tests in an effort to refute yourself.

So we do it for you.

And it goes on and on. You are even lying to and misleading your hopeful builder, who will soon find out for himself just what a fool and liar you are as he repeats the same work the rest of us have already done, but which you are concealing from him.

[WilbyInebriated]

Look, Wilby's tied himself up in knots. Granny knots, not shipshape bowlines or ring bends too.

He thinks Ainslie's circuit is a heater, when it's really a battery non-charger.

And it's extremely efficient at that, Wilby. It non-charges its battery with COP > INFINITY. READ THE PAPERS, which contain her claims. Any heat it produces is extra, a byproduct of it not charging its batteries.

And he thinks that looking in a mirror is an abusive argument against him personally, instead of simply pointing out his own location in time. Is that a fisherman's bend, there, Wilby, or just a slipknot?

How many CFLs can Ainslie's circuit light up, Wilby? Is ClassE the same as an Ainslie circuit, an inductive clamp test circuit, a deliberately feeding-back RF oscillator, the circuit listed in the .pdf you linked? Or not? Do you have some more oranges to compare, to see if they are really apples or not? Or maybe your problem is just that all your grapes are sour.

After all these years YOU STILL BEING HERE, they would be. Try making wine, that doesn't take much manual skill, just your own foot-stomping calhounedness will take care of it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3HemKGDavw

troll response from tinselkoala/alsetalokin coming up in 3... 2... 1...

[TinselKoala]

Yeah, a lead balloon is an appropriate metaphor for your sailing skills, isn't it.

But here's something more appropriate for this thread, you jive turkey-baster, you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjPlhb4f9P8

Brown haired monkey reply in three... two... one.....

Oh, I love those post-posting edits, don't you? Windex for the soul, that is what that is. Scrub it clean like a cool breeze in your face.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi again Little TK,

Here's an update to settle all that spite.  Enjoy,

Rosie Pose
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,3.msg2427/topicseen.html#new

[TinselKoala]

What, have you answered .99's questions about AC/DC coupling?
Or have you addressed Brian Ahern's bad math, which .99 has corrected?

No, neither of those, I'll bet. You probably make some more silly claims, like your bottom end LeCroy scope being superior to anything Tektronix can kludge together. Or perhaps you claim that the battery is entirely disconnected during the oscillations of your circuit. I know you can't make a post here without lying or insulting someone, so I would wager that you do the same there, where nobody will question you for fear of getting edited away.