Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 36 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

@All,

Some time ago I recall that there was discussion regarding the inductace of the CSR (Rshunt) used in the NERD circuit.  In the "paper" it is stated to be 110nHy.

Was this determined to be correct?

That's seems like a rather large amount of L to have to correct for regarding the observed current thru Rshunt at 1.5MHz.

So, what was decided, is 110nHy the value to use?

PW

Magluvin

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 04, 2012, 11:18:03 PM
Hi guys,

Here's the update...
Not very interesting - but NOR are these last few pages.

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2313.msg2493.html#msg2493

Regards,
Rosemary

edited
corrected the link

BuurrrrrP!   She couldnt hold it in any longer. Using Tor browser, well, not much to see.

Mags

Rosemary Ainslie

And guys,

Here's an update that I trust will be of extreme interest to you all.

Regards,
Rosemary

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2322.msg2495.html#msg2495

TinselKoala

Quote from: Magluvin on July 04, 2012, 10:04:16 PM
Whew, good thing she stopped her self just in time, err, almost. Just a lil cheese on the honey trap.  Most posts previous had links. I suppose she almost dropped a link to a new post over there. But she put on the brakes before letting it slip.

I guess we will never know.  ;]

Mags
Nah, it's just more mendacity, misrepresentation, and error. Same stuff different day. Or is it always the same day, mannnn....

Her builder has already told her that this present circuit isn't worth looking at, only the earlier Quantum circuit is of any significance, he believes. And he's sure that he's going to use driver chips for his mosfet..... and I am laughing, ho ho ho.

Then, she refers to her blog post where she says that there is an error in the schematic IN THE BLOG POST ITSELF, nowhere else, and promises to post the correct one "tomorrow"... but of course she never does. The blog post itself contains two schematics: the single mosfet one that is CLEARLY not the one used in the demo, and the 5 mosfets in strict parallel from a simulation program, apparently. NEITHER OF WHICH IS CORRECT. And... when she then refers to the "paper" for the correct schematic.... and then when the papers came out the papers contained two different schematics, NEITHER of which corresponded exactly to the Demo device (location of FG black lead). See below, and the blog post she references. Nowhere that I can find is a clear retraction of incorrect diagrams and an unequivocal posting of the correct one, and the blog post most definitely does NOT support the contention that the Q1-Q2 wiring error was known to her at that time.

Finally, the Ains-lies continue as she misrepresents and lies about the recent discussions here. Again, pulling values out of her hallucinations that we here have never espoused at all. And not a peep about the Q1-no-current issue or the FG current issue or the repeated lies about my work or the capacitor AC current path in her circuit.... just more lies and bloviation.

picowatt

A quote from her from over there:

"But the charm of this new circuit is that it shows that COP Infinity number with unerring regularity.  And that's certainly not an acceptable measurement."

You are 100% correct, "that's certainly not an acceptable measurement".  You have managed to make a reading on a 'scope indicate a negative mean power measurement, without taking lead inductace into consideration.  You have shown no proof of COP=infinity, by any acceptable definition.


And one more quote"

"Everyone trying very hard to convince themselves that the capacitance associated with our MOSFETs are able to GENERATE about 10 amps x >72 volts of energy onto our circuit."

This sentence either indicates you have no idea what is being discussed, or that your technical writing skills are atrocious, or possibly both.  "GENERATE" and "onto", what on Earth are you talking about?  Keep that spin coming, all surely see right thru it.

As we have been discussing the low impedance AC path during the oscillation phase (which apparently you do not find interesting), I assume you are saying that in one of the captures 10amps of AC current is indicated.  Please reference a figure, I see no such amount.

But, the bulk of the AC current that is flowing during the oscillation phase, does indeed flow thru the total parallel capacitances of all five of the MOSFET gate to source capacitances.  If you could follow along, and as it pertains to your circuit, you might actually find it interesting.

'Tis a pity...