Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

I KNOW you are a fool... and also a LIAR, AINSLIE.

WHY would I lie about this?  I just DON'T  GET IT?  I'm not trying to con anyone out of their money.

Do you  not recall why and how I got involved with you this time?

IT WAS BECAUSE YOU WERE CLAIMING THREE DIFFERENT MONETARY PRIZES, based on your INCORRECT CALCULATIONS AND UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS.


Why would you lie and distort? Because you have a classic IDEE FIXE delusional system and are a textbook example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. I think that a lot of the time you don't even realize that you are lying. Just like NOW.

Your laboratory told you that the battery charge most certainly declined during their tests, didn't they. That means that they falsified your hypothesis and your main claim. You can try to spin that however you like, call me whatever names you like but the fact remains: they falsified your claim. As has everyone else.

And as to those "contactable" references you always ALLUDE TO but never give... I have them right here as you gave them out at one point several years ago. Phone numbers too.

Colin Bower
John Tarnowski (remember that name)
Eddie Petrie
Viv Crone (ha!)
J Wilson (John, I believe)
J Marriot, formerly of SASOL
Eddie Tarnow... . (tarnow, tarnowski...hmm, just a coincidence, surely.)
Dr Garrett, formerly of CSIR and now heading their lab in Australia
John Greene at BP

Would you like to know the results of inquiries to these "contacts" that you have given?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

You must do your damnedest TK.  God knows you have NO INTEGRITY.  This is PRECISELY why I don't release the name of that laboratory.  I trust our members see this for themselves.   But we all KNOW WHY YOU WORK THIS HARD.  And that's far more beneficial to the general cause than your disgusting efforts at destroying this our work.

And I saw in an earlier post that you ALSO HAVE PROOF OF SOME HOSPITALISATION related to WHAT?  I require you to prove that claim TK.  Show me that proof.  Show me this documentation.  I have NO OBJECTION to it being published in these forums because I KNOW that there's no such.  Not ANYWHERE.  I have never been hospitalised.  And I am ENTIRELY sane. Which satisfies me that you're most certainly NOT the psychologist that you claim.

Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys,

My own reputation is not the issue.  The worst that TK can do there is IRRELEVANT.  I am old.  And quite frankly - it is NOT likely to make a blind bit of difference in my life.  What's important.  What's really at issue is the importance of these numbers that we're getting.  Please keep that in full focus.  We have repeated and demonstrated proof of COP infinity.  There is NO reasonable explanation for this in terms of standard physics.  This fact is acknowledged by every self-respecting scientist in the world.  Yet we have three or four dedicated contributors to this thread who repeatedly advise you that this is NOT IN FACT HAPPENING - or alternatively - IT HAS NO SIGNIFICANCE.

THIS REACTION IS ENTIRELY INAPPROPRIATE.  So. I beg you all.  You may read TK's calumny and I'm sure there are many of you who are even amused by it.  I don't know.  I don't even care any more.  But Please.  On bended knees - just know this.  He is also trying very hard to assure you that there's no significance in our work.  And he does this at the cost of your own best interests and in the best interests of your children and grandchildren and your own futures.  And he does this at the cost of the best interests of science itself.  And what it particularly disgusting is that he PRETENDS that he is an authority on science. 

It is ONLY IMPORTANT that the work survives - notwithstanding this unmerited and orchestrated and I believe well funded ATTACK.  It is the thing that keeps me awake late into the night.  I would be very sorry to find that these disinformation tactics ACTUALLY work.  Not when I've gone to such extraordinary lengths to keep this information OPEN SOURCED.  It means that Open Source is NOT the way to go.  And that would be a tragedy of ENORMOUS proportion.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

added

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I KNOW you are a fool... and also a LIAR, AINSLIE.

Do you  not recall why and how I got involved with you this time?

IT WAS BECAUSE YOU WERE CLAIMING THREE DIFFERENT MONETARY PRIZES, based on your INCORRECT CALCULATIONS AND UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS.

And are you forgetting that we also stated that our claim was to force acknowledgement of over unity?  And that any prize money would be donated to those members - chosen by our members - who would be able to advantage themselves from the purchase of much needed zut instrumentation.  It's an unfortunate truth that these benefits require broad bandwidth oscilloscopes.  And they cost.  And the most of our members - yourself included - DO NOT OWN THIS.  I do.  And neither I nor my collaborators will EVER lay claim to any prize money for ourselves.  It is intended for someone who REALLY needs to get equipment for furthering this and similar research into energy efficiencies.

Again
Rosie Pose

SO. Far from resisting this you should be doing your very best to ADVANCE IT.  Your reasons for your multiple level attack on me and my good name - are UTTERLY SPURIOUS. 

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

You are not some kind of free energy Joan of Arc that stumbled across a circuit that you now have to give to mankind.  You are just incompetent and obsessed.

You can try to shrug off making outrageous mistakes about your circuit when the material was taught to you in painstaking detail just two days before.  You don't understand your circuit, you don't understand MOSFETs, and you are completely clueless when it comes to electronics.  These are things that you demonstrate every single day, day in and day out.  You can try to ignore these facts and show a brave face and push on, but these blatant facts register with the people reading this thread.

If we are "paid disinformation agents" then surely you are a paid agent whose job it is to discredit all free energy research with your technical buffoonery, belligerence, and outrageous stupidity, because the latter is a hell of a lot more likely than the former.

You can't be selective about what you want to see and put on blinders to all information that is contrary to your "cause."

There are important principles relating to the truth about your circuit and science and technology and the scientific method and the application of knowledge and reason and we simply can't allow ourselves to become mindless guppies led off to slaughter by a false prophet like you.

You have nothing and you talk like an electronics crazy person.

MileHigh