Testing the TK Tar Baby

[picowatt]

My dear MileHigh

I have single handedly fended off the attack from no less than 8 of you - and I've done it with, I believe, a commendable constraint.  It is a sorry truth that you and TK and your 'friends' are somewhat lacking in any kind of human decency.  I am guilty of NOTHING other than attempting to advance some unequivocally anomalous measurements and some equally confrontational results in a prior claim - and on a forum that purports to be interested in such.  And it has evoked an attack that makes no sense at all.  And that attack is considerably less than legally permissible.

Rosemary

That's a crock.  I asked a simple question back in the locked thread and instead of an answer you fired off as many snide and denigrating comments at me as you could, rather than deal with the issue ethically and scientifically.  Reread your locked thread, its all there.

And yes, I lost all respect for you after your repeated threats.

So, you reap what you sow, from me at least.

How about .99 arbitrating the Q1 issue?

[fuzzytomcat]

****** BUMP ******

You cant even supply one (1) complete set of test data for a single claimed COP>INFINITY device test and haven't produced anything new in over a year just bloviating and baiting for fights wasting everyone's time.

Not actually.  I both can and have.

Rosie Pose

RIGHT Rosemary .... slime your way out of these two questions, I'm sure the "Open Source Community" would like to see answers without your constant bloviating

1) Where is your publically available posted link with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located "specifically" for Test #3 referenced in your "Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus" ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf [attached file] ) that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ??

2) Where is your publically available posted link with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located for "ANY" test using a 555 timer replacing the functions generator that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ??

Hi Fuzzy

How's that 'class action' lawsuit coming on?  Do let us know.  I've told you where to present your papers.  And I know your address if you ever want a reply.

Rosie Pose

Rosemary you low life idiot slimeball .... again you change the subject because you cannot and never have made publically available posted links with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY device(s) operation.

You are a nothing but a toothless super troll giving information on devices you created that are "FRAUDULENT" having "NO" proof of their operation other than cherry picked data for a THESIS.

So Rosemary ..... when are you going to give us the open source community and myself the location of the documents I asked for June 29, 2012?? 
You cant even supply one (1) complete set of test data for a single claimed COP>INFINITY device test and haven't produced anything new in over a year just bloviating and baiting for fights wasting everyone's time.
 

Your answer Rosemary given to me was ....   
Not actually.  I both can and have.  


OK Rosemary .... so .... where are the scope shots and accompanying data dumps, 10 ohm resistor/inductor heating profile, photographs of the device setup, device schematic and components used including wire lengths and awg sizes and time duration on information collection of the test, "specifically" for Test #3 referenced in your "Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus" ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf [attached file] ) that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ??

WHERE ?? WHERE ARE THEY ?? 

OR, THIS WHOLE CHINESE FIRE DRILL EXERCISE OF YOURS IS ONLY FOR A THESIS YOU CONCOCTED AND HOGGED PODGED UP AS "EVERYONE" THINKS ?? 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary:

Just shut up and stick to playing with your pulsing coils and your zipon fantasies.

MileHigh

I will NOT be quiet on this issue. I am committed to finding out each and every player who has done this damage to our technology.  And it is my MISSION to ensure that this is addressed - on whatever basis is required.  You have all enjoyed a freedom from accountability that is now nearing its end.  And I am proud to do my bit in getting it to this point.  I do not PLAY with my technology.  It constitutes serious research - both on a theoretical and experimental basis - and it is your own flaunted disrespect of this work together with your 'gang' that has mitigated against its advancement. 

But that is soon likely to end.  Thank you God.

Rosemary

[picowatt]

I will NOT be quiet on this issue. I am committed to finding out each and every player who has done this damage to our technology.  And it is my MISSION to ensure that this is addressed - on whatever basis is required.  You have all enjoyed a freedom from accountability that is now nearing its end.  And I am proud to do my bit in getting it to this point.  I do not PLAY with my technology.  It constitutes serious research - both on a theoretical and experimental basis - and it is your own flaunted disrespect of this work together with your 'gang' that has mitigated against its advancement. 

But that is soon likely to end.  Thank you God.

Rosemary

Exactly what damage have I done to your technology?  I did not publish papers with 'scope captures demonstrating errors in disagreement with the schematic and text therein.  YOU did that.

Again, I have only discussed the electronics involved in schematics and measurements/captures YOU provide.

As to the negative mean power measurement, I agree with .99's analysis.

As to any anomalous efficiency, I await some proper, error free data. 

So, how about accepting .99 as arbitrator of the Q1 not functioning properly in FIG3, 6, and 7 issue?

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

It constitutes serious research - both on a theoretical and experimental basis

That's your fantasy but it's not the reality at all.  You have nothing but you are too stupid and pig-headed and obsessed to realize it and acknowledge it.

It will be a complete farce if you do any experimentation by yourself because you are clearly not capable of doing so.  If you hire a qualified person to help you then it will take said person about 30 minutes to realize that you are clueless and chances are the relationship will end within one working day.  If you hire someone that is clueless or a sycophant or someone that is just going to play you for the money then your experiments will be "successful" but in fact you will not have advanced your "cause" by a single iota.

You will never get serious professional or academic consideration at a company or at a lab or at a university because if anyone has a technical discussion with you face-to-face it will take them a maximum of 30 minutes to realize that you are deluded and clueless.

There is no happy ending for your proposition, none.  You are so far from serious science that you simply don't stand a chance.  The only traction you will ever get is on the free energy forums.  And in fact even on the free energy forums, people that support you are like shooting stars, you only see one every few months and then they disappear.

That is your story - you are just going to spin your wheels on the free energy forums and no university, lab, or tech company is ever going to have anything to do with you or your proposition.

And you are not going to put people in danger for this useless nonsense.

MileHigh