Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

What are you staring at?

Don't you know, that if you look too long into the face of the Abyss... the abyss will look long, into you.......

[polln8r]

TK!

Very clever, sir! (It's the front view of you in the same pose as that back view pic with the light on your head!)
...so, this gets me into the illuminati MIB disinformation agent club, right?
polln8r

[TinselKoala]

Hmmm..... the "probe" of the battery is providing a positive "signal" to the gates of BOTH mosfets simultaneously through the 100 Rs. And the "terminal" of the battery is providing a negative "signal" to BOTH sources directly, at the same time. 12 volts, too. So BOTH mosfets will be turned on hard, directly short circuiting the battery through the very low on-state resistance of the mosfets and the negligible resistance of the 100 uH chokes. The "transfer loop" is another direct short circuit, as anyone can see, keeping the drains of both mosfets at exactly the same voltage. And of course the capacitors don't do anything, we know they block DC.

What is the matter with you TK, do you really think anyone is going to fall for that silly face, thinking it's a working diagram of anything? Ainslie might be a total ignoramus when it comes to circuitry, but her boffins, to a man, highly accredited academics, are far too sophisticated to fall for that silly, mocking cartoon of a schematic. Why, it's veritably _actionable_.

[Magluvin]

Hmmm..... the "probe" of the battery is providing a positive "signal" to the gates of BOTH mosfets simultaneously through the 100 Rs. And the "terminal" of the battery is providing a negative "signal" to BOTH sources directly, at the same time. 12 volts, too. So BOTH mosfets will be turned on hard, directly short circuiting the battery through the very low on-state resistance of the mosfets and the negligible resistance of the 100 uH chokes. The "transfer loop" is another direct short circuit, as anyone can see, keeping the drains of both mosfets at exactly the same voltage. And of course the capacitors don't do anything, we know they block DC.

What is the matter with you TK, do you really think anyone is going to fall for that silly face, thinking it's a working diagram of anything? Ainslie might be a total ignoramus when it comes to circuitry, but her boffins, to a man, highly accredited academics, are far too sophisticated to fall for that silly, mocking cartoon of a schematic. Why, it's veritably _actionable_.

Is it due to the inequality of the components, tolerances, that gets one transistor going first into trading punches?

MaGs

[picowatt]

Hmmm..... the "probe" of the battery is providing a positive "signal" to the gates of BOTH mosfets simultaneously through the 100 Rs. And the "terminal" of the battery is providing a negative "signal" to BOTH sources directly, at the same time. 12 volts, too. So BOTH mosfets will be turned on hard, directly short circuiting the battery through the very low on-state resistance of the mosfets and the negligible resistance of the 100 uH chokes. The "transfer loop" is another direct short circuit, as anyone can see, keeping the drains of both mosfets at exactly the same voltage. And of course the capacitors don't do anything, we know they block DC.

What is the matter with you TK, do you really think anyone is going to fall for that silly face, thinking it's a working diagram of anything? Ainslie might be a total ignoramus when it comes to circuitry, but her boffins, to a man, highly accredited academics, are far too sophisticated to fall for that silly, mocking cartoon of a schematic. Why, it's veritably _actionable_.

TK,

I would try to follow your schematic, however, I now have three laptops with melted screens from trying to burn it before I read it.

Would it be OK if I just read it first?


PW