Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 23, 2012, 04:08:56 AM

You can add whatever lies you like, apparently, without any regard for truth or logic. You are such a liar. There is NO CONCEIVABLE REASON ON EARTH that you would have sent "your" LeCroy off for "calibration" unless it needed repair. All digital oscilloscopes perform an internal calibration and self-checking routine whenever they are started up. If it fails this internal calibration check... IT IS IN NEED OF REPAIR. If it does not fail.... it does not need calibration. IDIOT.
NOT ACTUALLY.  I never did send that LeCroy off for calibration.  The agents did that - ALWAYS required on second hand equipment - in order to extend the guarantee.  You clearly KNOW NOTHING.  But then again - you've never bought a decent oscilloscope.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 23, 2012, 04:08:56 AMAnd I am supposed to be very well funded, am I not? With access to all kinds of special digital equipment. You have no clue whatsoever and you can't even keep your own deluded story straight.
NOT ACTUALLY.  I know nothing about your lifestyle other than on the face of it - it seems somewhat austerely compromised.  I'd say that's a general reflection of your mediocrity.   Clearly your earning abilities are equally so.  Both mediocre and compromised.  LOL  Strange.  With all that brilliant 'truth' that 'shines' one would expect you to be more gainfully employed.  Very odd.

Kindest regards little TK, all 72 inches of you.  LOL

Rosie Posie

added

TinselKoala

I know a lot more than you think, Ainslie. Details of that little incident, for example. And I've already established communication with the Law Firm of Manson Tobin. You have finally crossed a line with your threats and lies.

Manson Tobin Law Firm
P.O.Box 3584
Durbanville 7551
South Africa
Email: alex@mansontobin.co.za
Tel: +27 (0) 21 975 5766
Fax: +27 (0) 21 975 5822

Dear Mr. Alexander Manson and Mr. Lee Jonathan Tobin

I wish to bring to your attention some severely abusive and threatening internet posts that have been made by Ms. Rosemary Ainslie, who alleges that she is a client of yours. Please refer to the attached .zip file for copies of many of the abusive and mendacious postings that Ainslie has made. Not only is she threatening and abusive, but she has also made many false statements concerning a research project that she has been engaged in for over a decade. I have documented these false statements and have attached documentary proof of her lies and distortions. Note especially the evidence provided in her own words where she admits to concealing material information for nearly a month, between March 22, 2011 and April 18 2011, causing over 400 forum discussion posts to be made in discussion of her claim that one particular schematic was used, when in fact a different one was actually used by her. And also note her statement that she fully intended to continue with the deception, which was finally revealed by a sharp-eyed correspondent.

You will note especially that lately she has been making accusations that I and others have "rifled" her computer. This is ridiculous on the face of it, especially since ALL information in the files I have sent you has been gathered from her own forum posts and blogs. As you can see from looking at the files, the locations where I obtained them are all listed and are all public. Yet Ainslie has seen fit to call me a CRIMINAL, a FELON, and a lot of other things too, as you can see from perusing the statements in the compendium.

I realize that you are not in a position to evaluate the mendacious technical claims made by Ainslie. I can assure you that the majority of scientific opinion agrees with me, re her claims and "thesis" . This latter "thesis" by the way, exists in multiple conflicting copies on the internet, with many errors and mistakes in each version, with claims made in some versions that do not appear in others, with data that is clearly altered by editing in some copies but not others... and so on. In short, Ainslie is not only threatening and insulting me and others, but she is also engaged in very clear and egregious scientific misconduct.

I am hereby suggesting that IF this Rosemary Ainslie is actually a client of yours, that you give her some badly needed legal advice. She has promised, as you can see, to attempt to damage my good name, my reputation, and even has threatened me with physical harm ("Kill two birds with one stone, one of them TK", an internet post made by her that some have interpreted as a death threat against me.)

Sincerely,
(real name and law firm contact data attached, IN CONFIDENCE)

Attachments:
RAForumPostsA.zip
RAForumPostsB.zip
RAForumPostsC.zip
RANewForum.zip
SCRN3.zip

And, of course:

Rosemary Ainslie

And guys, while I'm at it - may I remind you all.

This technology that we've open sourced is intended for applications that will enhance energy efficiencies - NOTHING ELSE.  TK is trying his damnedest to avoid reference to that efficiency and is taking you all on a goose path related to complex applications that have NOTHING to do with efficient energy transfer.

I do not care what applications come out of this technology.  But unless they address those efficiencies then he is wasting your time with irrelevancies.  And his  real intention is to usurp SOLE authority to comment on this technology when his agenda is precisely to DENY those efficiencies.  Therein lies the danger.

Please be aware of this objective.  It's shared with picowatt and Sean and 'The Boss' and FTC and the rest.  Some heavily vested interest in denials here.  And none of it reasonable - all of it unsubstantiated - and certainly - AT BEST - a gross abuse of open source objectives.  I might add that not only is their standard of posting an ABUSE of forum guidelines, the most of their references to our work and my part in it is criminal - abusive - and it includes their criminality in making facts known that they've rifled from my computer.  What's particularly ominous is that far from caring about this flaunted disrespect Stefan Hartman is actually encouraging it.  That's certainly cause for concern.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 23, 2012, 08:54:13 AM
You omitted the LINK - YET AGAIN.  Here's the little ditty with its addendum that you were so careful to EXCLUDE.


And while I'm at it may I add - it's not you sits on that chair
You've photographed your friend TK - I know this from the hair.




You make me laugh. I thought for a moment that you might actually have had my name and address. Now I know that you are still hallucinating and responding to your delusions and fantasies and that your threats are just as the barkings of a little yapping ratdog. Oh, you'll bite all right, if someone is stupid enough to try to help you, that's clear enough.

You really need to step back and take a look at yourself and what is happening, Ainslie. You are melting down, you've crossed a very definite line, and you will be experiencing consequences.

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 23, 2012, 10:52:15 AM

You make me laugh. I thought for a moment that you might actually have had my name and address. Now I know that you are still hallucinating and responding to your delusions and fantasies and that your threats are just as the barkings of a little yapping ratdog. Oh, you'll bite all right, if someone is stupid enough to try to help you, that's clear enough.

You really need to step back and take a look at yourself and what is happening, Ainslie. You are melting down, you've crossed a very definite line, and you will be experiencing consequences.

Not actually little TK.  I'm ALREADY experiencing consequences.  Your prolonged attack has had serious consequences on my health.  I put on record that this disgusting thread and all those other flamed threads are  the single cause of my condition which is certainly life threatening.  You and MileHigh and the rest are attempting to destroy my work and my name along with it.  And IN FACT you have CERTAINLY been instrumental in destroying my health.  And you really think that you can avoid accountability?  Trust me on this.  You're even in my will.  You all are.

Rosie Pose