Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

D'ya suppose he'll take _all_ the information to his "actually credentialled" persons, or just his "positive" results?
How many possible causes for his data has he _ruled out_, to show that there's no other way his data could have arisen _except_ by some kind of overunity performance of his apparatus?

Since he doesn't want to talk about his work here...  as he keeps telling us... there's no way that I can tell. But I don't actually recall him reporting on a single test of a null hypothesis when he _does_ talk about his work, here or there; he's just been demonstrating that he can get the data he gets. D'ya think he'll be reporting his tests of null hypotheses to his "actually credentialled" persons?

D'ya think he even understands what a null hypothesis is, how to test one, or the logic of hypothesis testing in general?


gmeast

Quote from: mrsean2k on November 09, 2012, 06:01:33 PM
So why are you seagulling over here?

How robust can your results be if merely discussing them is a threat? Pure madness.


not worth discussing here

gmeast

Quote from: TinselKoala on November 09, 2012, 08:44:14 PM
D'ya suppose he'll take _all_ the information to his "actually credentialled" persons, or just his "positive" results?
How many possible causes for his data has he _ruled out_, to show that there's no other way his data could have arisen _except_ by some kind of overunity performance of his apparatus?

Since he doesn't want to talk about his work here...  as he keeps telling us... there's no way that I can tell. But I don't actually recall him reporting on a single test of a null hypothesis when he _does_ talk about his work, here or there; he's just been demonstrating that he can get the data he gets. D'ya think he'll be reporting his tests of null hypotheses to his "actually credentialled" persons?

D'ya think he even understands what a null hypothesis is, how to test one, or the logic of hypothesis testing in general?


I've shown everyone, that's worth anything, everything.  Which is why you haven't seen it all.

gmeast

Quote from: poynt99 on November 09, 2012, 08:29:12 PM
Then don't. Make yourself scarce.


ban me then,  revoke my posting privileges.