quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

The endless talk on this thread about complexity theory and information theory as proof of the 2nd Law is silly

First, let me say that I'm, as ever happy that you can not resist reading me and somewhat ironcally wish you could actually read more than the word "information theory" then revert to your usual bigoted positions.

the fact is that the 2nd law has never been mathematically proved

Your opinion here isn't worth much.  You are not qualified to pontificate on either subject. 

, the 2nd Law's very acceptance is based completely and solely on observation

Not true, and this is where you are acting as your usual stupid self.   What has been said by myself and not exactly a short list of physicists.  Is that some methods of attempting to break 2LOT have been proved mathematically unworkable.  Surprising that you can't see the difference.  Anyway if one kind of 2LOT violation can be proved unworkable then you are completely wrong about 2LOT being based "completely and solely on observation".

Stick to talking about something you know more than a high-schooler about.  Which apparently isn't math (or logic).

I've laid out my argument, if you wish to refute please do so.  Just saying I'm wrong or pretending I'm not worth your time (but clearly I am) isn't answering the rather glaring question.

(I think we have now 8 physicists / engineers who are 100% convinced

Is it really a good idea to trust anyone who's 100% convinced about anything, especially anything based purely on observation?  Like say the "sebby" effect?

and what did it gain the negistors and skeptics?

You're going to adopt that term?  Seriously?

nothing! They, after all is said and done, share the same planet with the same environmental problems, they watch the same poor millions struggle and starve for lack of cheap power and clean water, they see this planet undergoing massive changes that may threaten the very existence of the human race.

Actually being critical, thinking about the ways one could be wrong avoids all sorts of pitfalls.  Compare to people like the poster above who thinks putting a thermometer on a piece of tin-foil violates thermodynamics.  If we take your advice, broadly we should spend research money on tinfoil generators instead of things that might actually help the problems in this world.

So please, please, please, for just a few more days, will all the big mouths and small brain negistors and skeptics have their final moronic outbursts on the subject by calling me a fool, and idiot, a fraud and a scammer.

Didn't you give this speech before?

Also, aren't you making a liar out of yourself by posting while I am here and unmoderated?

[Regster]

@Phil:  Nice one, great to hear everything is going to plan.

[trim12]

Can't wait for batch one and two.

[orbut 3000]

Dear Friend Phil,
why can't you wait a few days and take your measurements before celebrating your victory?
After your astonishingly long and well documented history of failures, shouldn't you be a little more humble and cautious?
What makes you think that this time will be any different?


May the Force be with you,
Robut

[Philip Hardcastle]

Dear Friend? Orbut,


Let me preface my reply by acknowledgement that it is blowing my own trumpet, but clearly to refute your smear I need someone to talk from a position of knowledge.


What you call history of failures I see as an amazing effort by just one person (Moi) to advance a philosophical position to a point where it was tested and found to be correct, to then take that discovery and in just over a year, not only figure out how to make it a viable World changing technology, but to actually do it. Whilst you and others have done what??


I will also just this once directly acknowledge the childish comments of Sarky, I skimmed by the constant tirade of his mindless comments that I must be wrong because of it being in contradiction to information theory and later complexity theory, then when I challenge that position he now claims he never said information theory or complexity theory proved impossible a violation of the 2nd, but rather that it showed that some proposed ideas were unworkable, I really do not care for what others failed to do or for what others fail to understand.


I have violated the 2nd and others have verified that fact, I also have had partial quenco films made and saw via instruments the quenco effect as predicted, now I have made complete devices (well by tomorrow) that will allow room temperature conversion instead of the Sebby 500C.


All the stupid jibes and arguments put forward at this point in time do nothing to change the reality of 13 years of work.


My next post here will be the single word "Success"