quentron.com

[TinselKoala]

@tk,hey listen,if he got as little as 100microamps then the thing is already worth a good couple of million dollars to certain industries.

I have no argument there, as long as it can be shown that those 100 uA are from where he claims.

However.... do you not think that he would have proclaimed, loud and long, that he had achieved this feat? After all, we were promised data, not "data if the results are over a certain threshold."

The absence of the data that were clearly promised may indicate several things. It may indicate that no testing was performed. It may indicate null results from testing. It certainly does NOT indicate "success" even at a low level such as you suggest. It certainly DOES indicate that PJH.... or whatever he calls himself.... has missed Yet Another Deadline that he has crowed about and that he has used to keep interest and excitement up.

He has cried "Wolf" yet another time, and each time he does, his fanbase weakens.

[markdansie]

TK you are 100% right.
This is just as bad as every other claim like Yiltitz,
Lot of proposed tests, scientists, news conferences.
As I like to say "Show me the data"
To date no Pap engine, Magnetic motor, Buoyancy device, Gravity machine etc has been demonstrated to self run let alone produce excess energy. No credible data has ever been produced.
However there are many anomalies worth while looking at, one never knows.
Mark

[profitis]

@markdansie.im astounded at your dismissal of the promise of quenco when your eefg thingy may be doing precisely the same thing,i.e.rectification of hot tail electrons.

[profitis]

@tk.i,l give you a nobel prize if you can get a continuous 100micros from ambient sound,vibration,or even radiofrequency.so if he is getting that then it is a 2lot bust already.

[mrsean2k]

The site says "we still await test results from Germany". If it was milliamps I suppose your test wouldn't need to be particularly sophisticated. If it's suspected to be much lower (or is in fact non-existent), I'd guess after investing this much time and money, you'd want to make sure of whatever result you claim.


As for "deadline", it's his timetable. Characterising it as a deadline doesn't make it one, unless you can demonstrate any real consequence or jeopardy as a result of missing it. All a bit meh.