quentron.com

[lumen]

@profitis
Sarky does not care about the math, or the theory, or even a working device, he only cares if the information was in (or could be derived from) a book, because if it's in a book then it must be true. (yea right)

He makes his money by writing books that are mostly cites or quotes from other books. That's why it's so important to him.

[profitis]

@sarkeizen yeah you asked me to post em but i asked you to agree with em and you didnt,until today that is :-).dont be ashamed @sarkeizen its ok to agree with the frikkn textbook once in a while geez,youre acting like its against the law or something.yes i promised to quote a cite but realy,thers no need after today mate.whats the point now,that last citation summed it all up :-)

[profitis]

@lumen yes i know but he finaly agreed with my last citation,miracles happen :-)

[sarkeizen]

@sarkeizen yeah you asked me to post em but i asked you to agree with em and you didnt,until today that is :-).

As far as I can tell you are just pretending that I said something because you are frustrated.  That may work among the weak minded but not with most people...Ok it probably works with Lumen.

dont be ashamed @sarkeizen its ok to agree with the frikkn textbook

Ashamed of what?  What textbook?  So far all I've seen is you blathering and then you suddenly act like I've agreed with something which you can't seem to specify.

yes i promised to quote a cite but realy,thers no need after today mate.whats the point now

Hmmmm...what would be the point?  Oh I know...how about keeping your word?  Not sure if that's important to you.  Might not be, after all haven't you just made up a position for me right now?

But please don't stop posting.  Like I said, this story is amazing.

,that last citation summed it all up :-)

Again, you haven't posted any citations.  You even appeared to agree with this.  So again, not possible.

and now on to...

Sarky does not care about the math

What math?  Profitis posted some strings of symbols that he claimed were formulae and when I asked him what a particular symbol meant.  He wouldn't answer, no matter how many times he was asked.

, or the theory

What theory?  His theory is essentially *poof* magic.  I have been consistently requesting cites from reputable texts on theory but he keeps refusing.  He even promised to give one but now he's saying that he would break that promise.

, or even a working device

Sure a device that clearly and consistently violates 2LOT would be exceptionally interesting but anything that appeared to be something like that would very likely be wrong.

he only cares if the information was in (or could be derived from) a book, because if it's in a book then it must be true. (yea right)

Wow, way to miss the point.  Profits's main point was "All textbooks agree that X is true"

He makes his money by writing books that are mostly cites or quotes from other books. That's why it's so important to him.

Awesome Lumen the conspiracy theorist is back.  I love it.   For a second back there were you posted an actual argument I thought you were going all rational on me but nope....you're just as unhinged as you were when we first met.

[sarkeizen]

@lumen yes i know but he finaly agreed with my last citation,miracles happen :-)

@Lumen This is an interesting question.   Do you think I agreed with some statement of Profitis's?  If so you can point out where I agreed.