quentron.com

[profitis]

@sarkeizen yet im capable of refering you to the section titled,'rules of electrochemical cells'. please apply @sarkeizen.what.is.wrong.widjoo.apply the rules @sarkeizen.apply the rules of cells @sarkeizen.no tricks,no deception,no jokes.apply the rules to a T.not a B or an A,or a Z.a T @sarkeizen.a T so precise,so scientificly conservative,so disgustingly non-artistic,non-creative.a T @sarkeizen.doesnt this frighten you?it should.

[sarkeizen]

@sarkeizen yet im capable of...

...attempting to get other people to do your homework.  Yes you consistently ask me to research your point for you.  Which you said is plainly found in any textbook.  So either:

i) You do not have access to textbooks.
ii) You have textbooks and are unwilling to look things up in them and report them here in a way that I can easily check.
iii) You have textbooks are willing too look things up in them and report them here in a way that I can easily check but the things you are talking about are not contained in them (or are not contained in them in a clear fashion which makes your point)

As these are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive (in the current situation) and since i) is exceptionally unlikely and ii) violates the social contract of the discussion the most likely candidate is iii) if you are being sincere.  If you're not then the likely case is ii).

So you keep making your argument less likely (or yourself more of a jerk) with every vacuous post.

[profitis]

idono @sarkeizen you sound highly suspect.why would someone want a quotas when they was refered to a generalized textbook to calculate all relevant issues?its either because a)you dont understand chemistry textbooks and require help along the way,just say so if thats the case or b)you want to sabotage the claimants case by simply repeating the phrase,'but the emotional word everlasting isnt there' or c)your feelings are hurt by the possibility that the claimant is correct.which is it?the social contract was honoured when i wrote down the principals of electrochemistry earlier in the thread to assist your calculations.textbooks dont have emotional words like 'everlasting' in them even if something is everlasting.they speak just formulas and math.

[sarkeizen]

idono @sarkeizen you sound highly suspect.why would someone want a quotas

Just a cite EOA, that's what's been asked for and you said you would provide and you haven't.

Again either you have no access to textbooks, have access to them and will not provide them in a way that I can check or have access are willing to provide but they don't make your point.

they was refered to a generalized textbook to calculate all relevant issues

If this was true then you could provide a formal logical argument (a series of steps where each one is forced by the prior one) which would reach your stated conclusion (you can create a battery which will run an ipod or ipod like device forever) using only the resource you claim you have referred to.  However, you haven't done so even though you have been asked repeatedly.

Again this leaves us with a few mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive options:

i) You are not capable of making such an argument
ii) You are capable but are unwilling.
iii) You are capable and willing but the data simply does not support it.

If i) then your opinion is weaker than you claim it is, if ii) then you are violating the social contract of the discussion.  So again the most likely option, if you are being sincere and are at least knowledgeable enough to determine if you could make a logical argument is iii).

Your argument wasn't mutually exclusive or collectively exhaustive so your conclusion is not valid.

[broli]

profitis, have you considered to replicate the karpen pile with activated carbon. Surely the ginormous surface area of the material should have a profound effect on current.