quentron.com

[profitis]

hey phil.greetings from south africa mate.glad to see your still in the game :-)..im enjoying my time with sarkshmeizen here,he,s making me look good.im gona get him shmangled now on this wikipedia article watch me.. 

[sarkeizen]

yeah i mean forever man.and ever and ever and ever.like i said,forever

So how did you observe it lasting forever?

yes hardcastle,and everyone else who are investigating duo-entropy systems have a massive chance of success.

Not really.  Again it appears to violate information theory and complexity theory both of which are stronger systems than Phillips observation of the Cottingley Fairies.

.constructive?yes @sarkeizen,all these cells ive discussed above are constructable.all of them.

Again is your thesis that this can be demonstrated strictly by reading textbooks?  That is what you said before.  If not, you should say "No you have to build it" or whatever you actually mean.  Is this really so immensely difficult for you?

[profitis]

i,l answer your enquiries in series @sarkeizen: A) i watched it totaly flatten.then i watched it totaly recharge itself.something to take note of? B)violate information and complexity theory? But arent these just theories? C)no.not strictly by reading textbooks.you can build them aswell BUT if your lazy then you CAN try integrating platinum into the wikipedia article i gave you on oxygen concentration cells.havent you done this yet? Why not? Need help?

[sarkeizen]

A) i watched it totaly flatten.then i watched it totaly recharge itself.something to take note of?

So is that or is that NOT observing something running forever.  I'll give you a hint the right answer is capitalized.

B)violate information and complexity theory? But arent these just theories?

*sigh* A theory in science is a model which exhibits behavior which is in agreement with known evidence.  In mathematics it's something different.  It's an area of study which is consistent with axiomatic set theory - in other words you would have to have an exception to ALL mathematics in order for this to be untrue.  Something which is unproven, in math is called a "conjecture".  Such as the taniyama-shimura conjecture.

C)no.not strictly by reading textbooks.

But some complete and total moron who happens to have the same name as you said

no need to observe.its written and predicted in  textbooks under section 'electrode concentration cells' .again,do you want to question the credibility of all and every textbook on electrochemistry?

So again.  Are you abandoning this thesis?  Since you are CLEARLY CONTRADICTING YOURSELF.  You. Near. Total. Idiot. Troll.

[profitis]

@sarkeizen..A) well its observing something recharging itself.cant complain ey. B)a theory in science is just a theory e.g. some scientists agree with relativity theory and others dont.a theory becomes law when it changes to official certainty,however, some official certainties are perception-based and thus undergo regular official change.question: does your math laws allow for 2 interchangable maximum entropy states @sarkeizen? Would be interesting to know. C) it is written AND predicted in the biggest textbook under section 'oxygen concentration cells' in wikipedia.you just have to substitute platinum for other metals and go from there by rules.DID YOU DO THIS YET @sarkeizen.why not?