Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



quentron.com

Started by Philip Hardcastle, April 04, 2012, 05:00:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

maybe a diagram of the wikipedia-type gaseous cell equilibration will be easier for our audience and you to understand @sarkeizen.the cell before equilibrium stands with equal gas pressure and different gas activity across electrodes.after equilibration theres a gas pressure differential and equal gas activity across electrodes.the gas tap can then be opened to repeat the cycle.we do without the tap for practical purposes:

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on January 15, 2014, 08:39:22 AM
maybe a diagram
Not a formal argument.  Is this really so hard?  If your argument is so strong and obvious.  Then it should be simple to write out a series of steps (each separated by a line break) each one forcing the next.  However you never can seem to do that.  Even though you know this is the definition of formal-argument because it's been discussed many times.
Quote
of the wikipedia-type
Sorry, don't know what that is.

Anyway if you can't come up with a formal argument by the time I receive the textbook and find out that you lied about your cite.  Then I'm not going to bother anymore.

profitis

hey thats not fair @sarkeizen.everytime im nice and give you something from the textbooks you set the goalposts higher.its not fair man i dont think you really forgave me a minute ago.im gona tell on you man coz you not playin by rules of overunity.com or the rules of honour.

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on January 15, 2014, 02:21:29 PM
hey thats not fair @sarkeizen.everytime im nice
Name once.
Quote
and give you something from the textbooks
To date you have given exactly one thing from a textbook, a cite.  A cite which you made me wait months for and then you gloated and said that you were glad that you obstructed the conversation in this way.  So yeah, "nice" isn't really the word. "Asshole" is more accurate.

My request for you to provide a formal argument isn't raising the bar. It is both what you were asked for and you agreed to.  If you don't want to support your point.  It's no concern of mine, you will just lose the argument.

profitis

@sarkeizen..all concentration cells related to and including the wikipedia oxygen concentration cell spontaneously compress gases at expense of ambient heat.how much more of a bridge from establishment to overunity could a rational individual want? Karpen,s battery is related to wikipedia,s battery @sarkeizen.no fundamental difference.i challenge you to bring on a scientist to tell us how to kill the wikipedia establishment cell and settle this once and for all.