quentron.com

[MarkE]

PJH is very angry because nobody wants to buy a 'Sebby' for $5000. He has deleted his website again.

I think he has deleted the pages on his web site about half a dozen times.  Other than post it on his web page for a couple of weeks, I don't know what else he did to advertise his offer.  He said he would ship free energy devices capable of producing 10W.  If he hasn't built a working one yet and needs money to do that, then maybe he should try an Indiegogo campaign.

[orbut 3000]

I think he has deleted the pages on his web site about half a dozen times.  Other than post it on his web page for a couple of weeks, I don't know what else he did to advertise his offer.  He said he would ship free energy devices capable of producing 10W.  If he hasn't built a working one yet and needs money to do that, then maybe he should try an Indiegogo campaign.

But the latest deletion looks a bit like altruistic self-punishment. The "Closed due to lack of public interest" message can only be targeted at a very small audience, including himself, due to lack of public interest. Indiegogo is probably a good idea, but PJHs marketing expertise could be a problem. Maybe he should consult a skeptical person to make sure his proposal sounds serious and rational.

[MarkE]

Orbut, I'm sure that there are people out there at least in some colleges who would give his ideas a fair shake.  There is a professor in San Diego who writes a lot about 2nd Law issues.  He would be a likely person to look at PJH's ideas.

[sarkeizen]

A)my point IS the wikipedia battery

Well your old point was "(most if not all) Textbooks necessitate the existence of and the ability to create a device which can power a ipod-like device continuously and eternally".  Which is at least somewhat falsifiable although you have spent enormous amounts of time trying to avoid that.  Not to mention lying.

...and your new point is something you won't define, even though I've asked several times.

You're really trying hard not to look at your own ideas skeptically.

By the by I think I predicted that Philip's current ploy would be a flop.

[profitis]

my old point proves my new point which is that you cannot tell us or even provide someone to tell us or even quote someone to tell us how that wikipedia battery abides by kelvin statement @sarkeizen.theres no need for me to look at my own ideas skeptically anymore because now im looking at YOUR DEVICE skeptically bro.this thread will now hang on this note,the audience baffled,even scientists baffled,by your shocking inability to simply show us how kelvin statement fits in with the encyclopedia device.whats going on @sarkeizen?your going to start a revolution unintentionaly brother.better do something fast...(-: