quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

not by a long-shot @sarkeizen

I'd say we're pretty close to my goal.   See all you have to do is say you can't make your point about textbooks necessitating the existence of and the ability to create a battery which would continuously and eternally running an ipod like device from ordinary electrochemistry textbooks.

And your argument falls, because you said it was in "all textbooks" (and even being generous and assuming you meant "virtually all" or even "most" your argument is pretty much toast).

If it can be demonstrated from ordinary textbooks like the one you dishonestly asked me to check.  Then well, you would have to demonstrate that. But I think we all know you can't and I think you know you cant...why?  Simple.

By appearances you have a textbook - not the one you asked me to look at but who knows why you would make a stupid mistake like that - except to be deceiving.  If you really had a clear and straightforward argument from that text then instead of spending months being an asshole.  You could have just stated your starting point from the text, if I doubted you.  You could have just supplied photographs of the pages in question.  Then you could have made your argument from there.  If I wanted to read the book myself, I could have simply procured a copy.

Instead what do you do?

Lie about things ("Oh I'll get you a textbook cite after coffee", "I'll get you a textbook cite if you answer this question?", etc..)
Attempt to distract from the point ("No you have to build it", "You have to disprove some statement that I completely made up about you")
Stall (Three months for a textbook cite?, Weeks avoiding answering simple questions.  Simply refusing to talk about issues with your argument)

From the beginning I've been on one point, you either can not support your statement about textbooks OR the support isn't nearly as strong as you say.

You know you've lost this.  Time to suck it up loserboy.

[profitis]

so why dont you want to talk about the WIKIPEDIA OXYGEN CONCENTRATION CELL @sarkeizen? Anybody else notice this?

[profitis]

or wikipedia gaseous spillover cycles @sarkeizen? Anybody else notice this?

[profitis]

or the relation of wikipedia oxygen concentration cell to wikipedia catalyst oxygen gas spillover?anybody else notice this?

[profitis]

or platinum-gold oxygen gas spillover,nevermind platinum-platinum oxygen gas spillover?anybody else notice this?