Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



quentron.com

Started by Philip Hardcastle, April 04, 2012, 05:00:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 42 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

@sarkeizen..nope.the nernst equation is no fallacy buddy-bro.youre basicly saying that the nernst equation doesnt lead directly to a working wikipedia oxygen device when my whole argument is that it does.

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on February 06, 2014, 03:49:41 PM
the nernst equation is no fallac
I'm not commenting on anything other than your claim that if I can not demonstrate something than it affects the truth of the statement: "an ordinary textbook NECESSITATES the existence and ability to build a battery which can power an ipod like device continually and eternally".  Which is what you are claiming and it is a logical fallacy...moron.
Quote
youre basicly saying that the nernst equation doesnt lead directly to a working wikipedia oxygen device
I can't be saying that because you've never provided a useful definition of what that is.  :D :D :D

What I am saying is that a) You haven't provided a correct cite from an ordinary textbook and b) You haven't provided a formal logical argument to the conclusion "therefore it is impossible for an eternal battery to not exist and it is also impossible to rationally claim that it can not be built".

Clearly you have provided neither of those, so clearly you have not provided a relevant argument to your point that an ordinary textbook NECESSITATES the existence and ability to build a battery which can power an ipod like device continually and eternally.

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on February 06, 2014, 03:26:00 PM
@mark E..but if i show you something that proves numbers 1 and 2 is there the possibility that you would give me a full-time job? :D:D
Profitis any employment problems you might have would not be much of a concern.  But first you would have to prove one of the claims.  Saying you can prove something and actually proving it are very different things.

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on February 06, 2014, 03:49:41 PM
@sarkeizen..nope.the nernst equation is no fallacy buddy-bro.youre basicly saying that the nernst equation doesnt lead directly to a working wikipedia oxygen device when my whole argument is that it does.
You do know that in an air - metal battery that the metal electrode oxidizes don't you?  Even if one treats the finite oxygen in the atmosphere as effectively unlimited, the amount of metal in an air - metal battery anode is far more finite.  That's true even if one were to construct a really big cell.

profitis

@mark E wow i might just take you up on that challenge because i can get a job in research here easily but our currency is crappy,even if we get a large sum.when i said wikipedia oxygen device i was refering to wikipedia,s oxygen concentration cell seperate from its accelerating effect upon iron corrosion.