quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

Both T and M can be demonstrated

Incorrect.  T as you have stated it.  Can not be demonstrated purely empirically, furthermore the only form of evidence which will satisfy T is a textbook cite.   Both these problems have been proved several times in this thread.

Again, you are simply wrong and are unable to believe that.  Interesting.

[profitis]

yawn @sarkeizen im sitting nice and lazy in my hammock here waiting for you to put the slightest dent on my latest terrorising statement,do me a fave and refill my glass esprit while you paw through the textbooks? 

[sarkeizen]

er
do me a fave and refill my glass esprit while you paw through the textbooks?

So in other words you can't support the True Profitis Statement.  Which means you lost.

[profitis]

your criteria isnt the only way to support textbooks @ sarkeizen.read my last statement carefully word for word and you,l see its disgustingly textbooktised.so much so that you have to ask yourself,'hey,why was i ever against the idea of 2 superimposed entropy states in one system?why was i? Why was i?dang!' Equilibrium potential differences can be evil.

[sarkeizen]

your criteria isnt the only way to support textbooks

Nothing about my criteria.  It's your criteria in your True Statement of Profitis.  Which require an ordinary textbook.  Now if you were wrong about that, that's fine.  You can just say so.

l see its disgustingly textbooktised.

If you have a cite from an ordinary textbook which supports the True Statement of Profitis..  Then feel free to provide it, however before you said you couldn't do this.  Which is probably true and makes me right.