quentron.com

[profitis]

I simply asked a simple question to you @mark E.your the one who went and made it unpresentable.it appears as though mr hardcastle was right.you won't be answering it anytime soon.

[sarkeizen]

No lies @sarkeizen.you or anybody

So Philip can't but you thought he might.    You realize that "can't" and "might" are mutually exclusive.

it has been the highlight of my life to have made such a bold declaration here in on internet

Dull life.

knowing that nobody can or will prove me wrong

If you provide a formal argument as described by me earlier, from a textbook cite.  I will prove it wrong (or prove that it's not a formal argument) inside of a day.  So it seems the only reason "nobody can" is because you are hiding your argument.

There are probably hundreds and thousands of arguments I can't prove wrong...simply because nobody mentioned them to me.  Yours is pretty much the same thing.  Not sure that's something to be proud of though.

[profitis]

Philip is the electrostatics expert here @sarkeizen so of course I might be wrong on the above diagram,s thought-experiment.counterarguments for my declaration are a dime a dozen,you have to physically prove that Im wrong mr sarkeizen.

[sarkeizen]

Philip is the electrostatics expert here @sarkeizen so of course I might be wrong

Then you can't say "not you not anybody" if somebody can.  From where I sit Philip has only shown expertise in making grand claims.

counterarguments for my declaration are a dime a dozen,you have to physically prove that Im wrong mr sarkeizen.

So your argument can be easily defeated logically.  Figured as much.   That's why you need to hide it.

[MarkE]

I simply asked a simple question to you @mark E.your the one who went and made it unpresentable.it appears as though mr hardcastle was right.you won't be answering it anytime soon.

You made a claim that a particular process is reversible.  You have failed to even begin to offer any credible argument for that claim.