quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

Christmas came early.

I had decided some time ago when  constantly attacked by Sarkeizen

It's interesting how when someone, like yourself exists in an echo chamber you start to slowly change your story.   While anyone who reads this thread can see.  My original comments where about information theory.  You being less qualified than a houseplant on this subject simply ignored my comments from the beginning.  At that point the conversation - in the loosest sense of the term - ended.  After that it was more about the people here who unquestioningly swallowed what you said and you berating anyone who decided to accept the larger body of evidence against your beliefs.   Eventually because you have had nothing to say (What can you say when you produce nothing except "It's going to happen soon").  The discussion left your technology entirely.  Only occasionally veering back when you did something weird like start selling cartoons or offering  or had your website taken over by someone from Japan.

cheap uneducated shots rather than contributing anything material.

How is MarkE's position "uneducated" when you admit that science overwhelmingly favors his position?

For the record I say I have never been more confident of my position and my work.

Who cares?  This means nothing to most and should mean nothing to anyone.

Of course working as a micro team on a massive breakthrough takes time

How did this become "of course" from "Be ready to eat your hat on <insert one of a good fifteen specific dates>"? 

My work will be proved by product, not by words.

You know in probability theory every negative result.  Every time you don't produce a device - which is for everyone here ALL the time - your work is less likely to be correct.

I applaud Profitis and pomodoro who are to my mind two people who at least give some efforts to discuss science and experimentation.

I cited about two or three papers within my first dozen posts.  You have cited zero in response.

[profitis]

Mark E'Engines run at steady-state until they run out of fuel.'

I have asked you all through this thread like a child to the teacher,'what fuel is consumed here'.you have failed to give an answer.

[profitis]

Mark E'A steady supply of gas is required and consumed.'

You have failed to tell us what fuel and what consumption. highly irregular for a scientist who supports the known laws of physics.

[profitis]

Sarkeizen'My original comments where about information
theory.'

What is it you want to know.speak in terms that all who watch can understand including children. 

[sarkeizen]

Sarkeizen'My original comments where about information theory.'

What is it you want to know.speak in terms that all who watch can understand including children.

Information theory and complexity theory both have something to say about Philips alleged quentronium.