quentron.com

[mscoffman]

@Philip

My tendancy is that you should consider the changes your device will
bring to be a "wave" and you need to be able to surf this wave to
your ultimate success goals. This will require having the best and
brightest people in your organization to continue it on into the future.

Don't worry about the changes it will bring to society, as we humans
ultimately have and will continue to *greatly* benefit from these type
changes. The costs of some things *must* drop in order to create a
profitable situation and to enable further change.

In the free enterprise the monetary system is a data processing system
designed to follow human desire and activities to go where they lead and
to create the optimum in safety and flexibility. The monetrary system, or
cash, should never be left to or expected to lead us humans to what it or
somone else says we want! So create what you desire, make sure it is
safe for the masses and expect the monetary/businesses system track
that. Any different is simply being delusional.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[hartiberlin]

@Stefan, the quencos being made for hearing aids are just 1mm x 1mm x 50um thick, so they look like a bit of glitter.


Phil

Hi Phil,
wow such a small scale device can power a hearing aid device ?

1mm x 1mm x 50um thick delivers 1.2 Volts and how many MilliAmps ?

If that can deliver at least 100 MilliAmps that would be great !

Seems you really have found some great material mixes to do this...

It seems to be like a real Maxwell´s daemon circuit, by just ordering the fast
electrons to just one side of the material and just getting a voltage differential.

Looking forward to your release date.

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[Elisha]

Hi the broli Idea is very good.


The first thing is have the goal clear, "Get to equilibrium with nature", that is: dont use energy fuels that contaminate.

Forget donations, this is "funding new source of energy", "Funding Energy freedom", make several goals, example:
If 1 millon dollars, then we star the production of device model 0.
If 5 millon dollars, then patent 5$ per device
If 10 millon dollars, then patent 1$ per device.
If 50 millon dollars, free patent to all the world.


Is very important to make several prizes related with the funding amount, example:
If 10 dollars or more, then my name in "web page of fame"
If 100 dollars or more, then postal card with my name "I funding the new energy source certification"
If 300 dollars or more, receive test device model 0 and book about the invention.
IF 500 dollars or more, then right to test a sample device modelo 0.
If 1.000 dollars or more, then right to fly to Phillip test facility and take photos with phillip.
If 10.000 dollars or more, then lunch with Phillip.


Be ready to have a full forum, and a very loaded web page.


Dont say anything about the ultimate changes of this technology, we dont know it, just say the happy future, energy for all, creations of employment, small devices, more wireless devices, etc.


God will help you, Phillip.

[e2matrix]

Sounds like broli has a fairly good set of ideas (for a change ....   just teasing you broli)  and my guess is the biggest resistance initially to this technology will come from the big battery companies.  Duracell is part of Procter and Gamble.  Eveready will be another that could suffer catastrophic loss once this really gets going.  Like most tech I will guess this may start small in replacing standard batteries in flashlights (this market is much larger than you might think - Candlepowerforums has over 139,000 members) and RC hobby cars, planes etc will likely jump all over having a super long lasting battery.  Then as it is proven it will expand to larger things like cars or home power.   One scenario I can imagine is having the two major battery makers in the U.S. (Duracell and Eveready) get in a bidding war for rights to produce this.  I really have no idea if that could happen but if it did it would seem it could be very lucrative for you.  I think the fact that both these companies make rechargeable batteries (hundreds of times more economical in the long run) and yet that has not killed their throw away battery market says some things will be slow to change but I can imagine them both wanting to have rights to the technology. 
   
   Blessings for all the right forces to be in place for this to move forward successfully.
   WHAT A WONDERFUL WORLD IT WILL BE ....
   

[Philip Hardcastle]

Hi to all the people who have recently posted advice and ideas, all very much appreciated.


I do not want to disregard the ideas of crowd funding, of competitive bidding wars and so much more you guys have suggested, all of which seem to me to have merit, but reflecting on such comments it came to me that the answer might be simpler and fairer.


SO here is a new idea of mine, if it is dumb please tell me as brutally as you care to (but include your reasoning)


How would it be if I published the patent and the vids and the lab reports, expert reports and anything else, plus give to engadget and gizmo a usb quenco so that everyone can see that 1mm x 1mm piece of Quenco can power an iPhone?


Then I publish a legal document drawn up by experts that essentially says any and everyone on the planet is welcome to use the tech for their own use free of charge, if however you want to use it in a product you must pay a royalty fee equal to 1% of the sale value of the product.


The 1% royalties would be paid into the quenco foundation (to be founded), a not for profit company registered in the USA whose obligations would be to create applications and designs, blueprint, CADs for free distribution to the World.


The foundation would pay me 1% of the 1% royalty fees paid into the foundation.


The foundation would be run by members selected from many countries and who would be suitably qualified (or experienced) in engineering, physics, agriculture and the humanities and other important disciplines. The organisation would be prohibited from owning or controlling any company or stock. Its sole purpose would be to create technology that is for the benefit of mankind (no weapons).




My reasoning for the above is that to make quenco quickly adopted for co2 abatement and food production and.............. is beyond my skills, and probably beyond anyone one person, however the free enterprise model sort of works, but it needs some new dynamic, maybe that change is for future science and technology to be free for all to adopt and profit from, to take as much research away from big business and secret labs as possible.