quentron.com

[memoryman]

profitis, I don't subscribe to the large scale suppression mentality. I would do some active exploration in the LoT2 violations, if I had the resources. Nanotech requires very expensive equipment.
As to others proving an extraordinary claim, I am on MarkE's side.

[profitis]

Neither do I fully subscribe to the suppression mentality memoryman.corporates will shelve for a number of reasons beside politics.politics are not a problem unless one becomes too loud or unless one is on a mission to 'break the rules for the sake of breaking the rules'.stupidity.markE wants to see working devices in action,I don't blame him most people do even I do.if he has a lab he can check my claims out anytime he wants to.the only reason I made my claims here is so that I can take credit for for my claims before someone else does.

[sarkeizen]

No @sarkeizen.phillip showed a few pictures,and some words.I showed a textbook statement and a video.quite a difference wouldn't you say?

Only if you're stupid.  Which you are.

[sarkeizen]

Dr.Daniel Sheehan http://www.sandiego.edu/cas/about_the_college/faculty/biography.php?ID=485 has demonstrated (as far as I am concerned) that LoT2 can be broken; he is not confident that a practical device can be made.

"Demonstrated" must mean something different to you than to me.  I watched a lecture of his from 2011 (which was given at some conference along with a lecture by someone else on "distant healing"?!) and he stated unequivocally that 2LOT has **never** been violated experiementally.   An interesting bit was in the beginning where he mentions the inductive problem with proving 2LOT.  Effectively any empirical fact which can be applied to an arbitrary number of cases requires an infinite amount of evidence to validate.

In the same breath though he says that "If a law could be proved then it would be a theorem".   Complexity theory and information theory approaches 2LOT in precisely that way.

[profitis]

So then what kind of evidence would satisfy you that demons exist @sarkeizen. What are your standards for evidence