quentron.com

[profitis]

I disagree @sarkeizen.this thread is history in the making.this thread is one of the greatest contributions to science in the history of overunity.com.if mark E doesn't have sufficient knowledge to tell us why a simpleton contact potential is irreversable then phillip hardcastle will fill us in.

[profitis]

@mark E.imaginary world? So tell us then,please enlighten us scientists: what thehell is going to happen IF any self-discharge of that capacitor takes place.it seems you are claiming that it shall remain permanently chargedup on open switch,correct?

[sarkeizen]

I disagree @sarkeizen.this thread is history in the making.

You live in a dull world. 

phillip hardcastle will fill us in.

Look if you want to keep your argument a secret.  I get it.   Less risk to your ego not to mention it would put an end to your trolling.
If Philip says something that makes you agree you are completely wrong.  Then it would be based on an assumption that you probably knew deliberately didn't tell anyone.  Which pretty much validates my argument.

Not sure what about that makes Philip intelligent or this thread worthy of the history books.

[profitis]

Mr sarkeizen it boils down to only 2 possibilities: 1)the capacitor remains permanently charged in which case it never had to touch the other metal in the first place for equilibrium or 2)it is charged only when contact happens leaving a stable reversable entropy position open for us when seperate.I just want mark E to tell me its number 1 and close the case that's all. 

[profitis]

And this thread is damn valuable because who ever discussed irreversabilites or reversabilities of contact potentials on the forum or even the whole internet before? Certainly nobody on the forum.