quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

so far you gave us no reason why phillip's device should not be able to sort hot from cold

Actually again the BBBV likely applies to Philip's machine.

wheras I've given a good few reasons why it should

Nope.  You haven't even defined what the device is capable of hence it is impossible for you to have provided reasons for it not to be under the BBBV.

Try again, this time speak less troll and more English.

[profitis]

Sarkeizen'Actually again the BBBV likely applies to Philip's machine. '

In what way.(ps. I'm glad you said likely and not definitely,it shows growth of character and a change in your viewpoint )

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'You haven't even defined what the device is capable of hence it is impossible for you to have provided reasons for it not to be under the BBBV. '

I have I have too

[sarkeizen]

You haven't even defined what the device is capable of hence it is impossible for you to have provided reasons for it not to be under the BBBV.

I have I have too

Sorry then you should be able to say....

How data is encoded....no answer from profitis here.
How the sorted output is read...no answer from profitis here
How the performance scales with input size...one answer based on a prior machine but his new made-up machine we have no output.
I'll add the question: "Is the output deterministic?" to the list.

So no, nothing remotely approaching a definition that would say if the BBBV applies or not.   

Good show using English in your post though.  Keep up the good work.

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'So no, nothing remotely approaching a definition that
would say if the BBBV applies or not.'

a prism violates bbbv theorem.it uses a quantum effect to sort better than O1 instantaneously.thus your bbbv theorem cannot be used in any argument whatsoever from now onwards