Overunity, Green Energy, Powered by Gravity!

[sterlinga]

Darrell,

Several people have been in touch with me, who have had extensive dealings with you in the past.

The conclusion I glean from them, which you are free to refute with the validation proposal I submitted earlier today, is as follows:

1) You do not presently have a functioning prototype.
2) You have never had a prototype that made a full rotation, with acceleration between rotations.

When you do achieve a functioning prototype, let us know, and we would be glad to come validate your claim.

I've updated the feature page to reflect this:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Darrell_Vandusen%27s_Gravity_Motor

| Sterling D. Allan
|
| New Energy Congress
| http://newenergycongress.org
|
| PES Network, Inc, Executive Director
| http://pureenergysystems.com
| http://freeenergynews.com
| http://pesn.com
| http://peswiki.com
|
|   "The best news and directory service on the net
|    regarding cutting edge energy technologies."
|
| newsletter: fe_updates-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
|
| home office: 1-801-407-1292
| Eagle Mountain, Utah, USA

[hartiberlin]

Jim Mich wrote:

Darrell's wheel does not have springs pushing weights inward. The spring concept variation was conceived and posted by Stefan at overunity.com

Hi Jim,
this is right, Darrell?s machine seems to have only some springs
in his lock-unlock mechanism to help the fixing and unfixing
of the weights on the spokes, but the weights themself are not
spring supported to move more easily...

The spring idea is my own and I guess it would make the
machine more efficient or at least at all selfrunning,
as a weight, which has gone down in the gravity field
has LOST its potential energy and could not be pulled back without additional energy. But if you store the movement in a spring you
can then make the torquearm longer on one side ( heavier),
get the rotational energy  from this heavier torquearm and accelerate the wheel with it
and then pull the weight back via the spring
and thus save additional energy to move the weight.
Maybe Darrell?s spring based lock-unlock mechanism helps this a bit,
although he just uses some ramps to shift the weights,
although the ramps seems to be special designed to do it efficiently.

Regards, Stefan.

[hartiberlin]

Hi Sterling,
I agree, it is time for Darrell to come forward and present a running
machine to you or any other visitor, as there are too many
people telling negative things about Darrell.

If he really has a machine running, it is time to come forward
and present it, otherwise he will have missed his chance and most of the people
will only remember him of having faked the videos ??

[hartiberlin]

P.S: If you try to rebuild such a machine or simular designs
at least have this music running,
maybe it will give you the right inspiration:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280009186655

Have a nice day !

[hartiberlin]

Hi Sterling and All,
this is what I just received by Darrell.
I was myself under the impression , that he still had the working
6 foot machine.. I did not understand from my conversation with him,
that he has changed it now to a ,nonworking so far,  8 foot machine.

Best regards, Stefan Hartmann

----- Original Message -----
From: "DARRELL VANDUSEN" <vandugegs@yahoo.ca>
To: "Stefan Hartmann" <harti@harti.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:31 PM
Subject: Facts.


> Hello Stefan, you can forward this if you would, Thanks
>
>   Hello Mr Sterling,
>
>   In regard to your thoughts.
>
>   <Several people have been in touch with me, who have had extensive dealings with you in the past.>
>
>   I have dealt with only two people,  in person.
>
> <The conclusion I glean from them, which you are free to refute with the validation proposal I submitted earlier today, is as
follows:>
>
> <1) You do not presently have a functioning prototype.>
>
>   If I had the ability to rebuild, the six foot machine, I could show you a real life, hands on, working machine.
>   For now, you can make up your own mind, with what I have show en others. The video, with self start up.
>   When I took apart the six footer, I did so, so I could do just that. I could still put it back together again.
>   The six foot machine was changed into an eight foot machine, the one that has been posted.
>   This is now being replicated into what has now become a 9 foot 4 inch machine. This machine is still being worked on. It has
been about a year and a half now. The person doing the building seems to be taking way to long in his completion of this new
machine. The reason for this replication is so it will have a gen orator and tachometer hooked up to it in order to prove extra
power output and that the machine is not slowing down while under load.
>   Also that someone else can build it.
>
> <2) You have never had a prototype that made a full rotation, with acceleration between rotations.>
>
>   I have had a machine that starts and continues to rotate, the six foot machine. that is showen in the video clip.
>   The video, people that have signed an NDA, in order to see, shows enough for those that can understand what they are looking at.
>   While talking about NDA's in the last day, I have seen that people have obtained the video through other means and even through
a person that was suppose to delete all information that they received.
>
> <When you do achieve a functioning prototype, let us know, and we would be glad to come validate your claim.>
>   People can believe what they may, that is any-ones choice, maybe you should look at the video yourself, if you have not already
been given one.
> If you would like, I can bring you up to date with the facts and not hear say.
>   I use the MSN messenger, if you would like the facts and the evolution of the machines.
>   It would be nice to do a complete history of this machine, all 25 years.
>   Bits and pieces, does not do it or me justice.
>
>   Thanks for your time.
>
>   Darrell Vandusen Sr
>