Using Chas Cambel Flywheel System For 15 Horsepower

[No clue 25]

Thank you for the reply.  I appreciate your opinion.    I have also been very puzzled by how he has gotten by with all the friction built up in all the pulleys and belts in between all those wheels but I figured he nulled it out with all that rotatiating mass at different speeds.  There is a replica on YouTube and the guy used 750watt Motor to generate 2350watts I think.  That sounds pretty good gain to me.  Is there maybe a better generator design out there to generate power(servo, stepper, or alternators).  I think friction could also but cut down using oils instead of grease for bearing and aren't sepentine systems more effecient( I could be totally wrong).   I was thinking of using capacitors as a battery instead of the flywheel but they scare the shit out of me so I'm sticking with mechanical system I think.  Anyway thanks  I really appreciate any input.

[No clue 25]

I have also read that pulsing a dc motor will greatly improve its efficiency and I can c how but has anybody had success doing it.  I haven't seen it yet.   Thanks

[ingyenenergiagep]

Average electric motor efficiency is about 80%.
Belt drive: 10% wasted energy.
Average generator: 80%
Total efficiency: 0,8 x 0,9 x 0,8=0,576. Very low.
We must use "overunity" motor and generator without transmission losses(gravitational force, magnet repel force, forms of resonance, resonace ferquency, etc.) .

I think the Chas Campbell device get overunity from AC resonace, if the system is on perfect resonance, RPM-s.

[tinman]

There is a discussion on energeticforum.com going on right now about a device that I believe uses a similar principle.  It has some of the brightest members over there talking about it as the inventor has been given some awards and while the device initially seems to defy logic (as to how it could be COP > 1) it now has some possible explanations by the sharper minds on that thread.  Here:   http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/11282-awarded-machine-multiply-force-motor-free-energy.html

So yes I think this device from Chas has potential and always did believe there was something to it despite the negative PR some have given it.  I think it will take some work to get it tuned just right so I would suggest patience is needed in a build like this.  Best of luck.

Lets have a look at what these bright members have to say.
!!Quote from the guru him self(Aaron)-There is no such thing as conservation of energy.
Second, you say power is rate of energy in time but it is not. Power is energy dissipated divided by time so you take the time out of it to see what the power is. If you have 1 watt second or 1 joule over 1 second, that is the real energy dissipated. If you take 1 watt second and divide it by 1 second, you have 1 watt. 1 watt by itself is POWER - there is no time in a power reading so your statement that power is energy in time is incorrect.

Yes, energy and not just power CAN be multiplied by using environmental input (gravity for example) as a source of potential that can do work on each successive cycle. The free input from the environment delays the time the system comes into equilibrium so that the amount of ENERGY dissipated by our own input is MULTIPLIED bit by bit by bit. !!

Lol-what chance do they have lol.
There is one bright member over there on the case though.

!!Quote FarmHand: That's not multiplying the energy, that is just adding more. If you enable the
environment to input energy to your device then that input energy is a result
of your actions and therefore it's your input, just like with a solar panel. It's
all just word soup. But the reality is.
An amount of energy in itself cannot be increased or multiplied.
If you want more energy then you need to make more energy available.!!

Good to see on bright mind on the job anyway.

[tinman]

bugler,  Please look in on the message thread here:     http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/11282-awarded-machine-multiply-force-motor-free-energy.html
If you know most of the people discussing it there as well as I do you know there are some brilliant minds discussing how this is possible.  While it is not the same thing it is similar.   I'm not saying I know one way or the other but the fact that it is even being discussed and good theories postulated by some there tells me this requires more than just a quick look.

What that guy has made,is a heavy duty paint shaker-nothing more.