Using Chas Cambel Flywheel System For 15 Horsepower

[penno64]

Sure, its on pes.

http://www.overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg382462/#msg382462

Regards, Penno

[bugler]

!!Quote from the guru him self(Aaron)-There is no such thing as conservation of energy.

What you consider a guru I consider a clown. He is nothing but a censor.

[wings]

another viewpoint:
"This is the mechanical overunity motor of Tarieal Kapanadze Part 1. In the German translation it is said, that it also used gravitation. But I guess it just only uses the inertia of the 2 disc. It is said, that the 2 disc are of steel and brass or maybe each disc a double layer of steel and brass and that these disc are connected via a brass wire, that is isolated from the steel shaft."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3thvqFhFIfY#t=60

not two capacitor plates but two rotating mass with a torsional spring that give rotational oscillation of the two disc like the oscillating pendulum the explanation in the middle of this page
http://tarielkapanadze.ru/kelly5-2.htm

Chas Cambel have large Flywheel System and long transmission chain that give same torsional oscillation effect gap and transmission delay help the oscillation
http://www.overunity.com/12464/using-chas-cambel-flywheel-system-for-15-horsepower/dlattach/attach/112139/image//

Raoul Hatem's heretical statement is that using spinning magnets coupling that probably give rotational oscillation vibration
http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/Ch2/Fig30.jpg
from
http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/Chapt2.html


http://www.edn.com/design/analog/4368829/Back-EMF-method-detects-stepper-motor-stall
Universal motor concepts
[size=78%]Back-EMF method detects stepper-motor stall figure 6BEMF is directly proportional to angular velocity, or armature speed, and motor torque is directly proportional to motor current. The following equation clearly illustrates the relationship between angular velocity and BEMF: BEMF=−N×B×A×ω×sin(ωt), where N is the number of coil turns, B represents the magnetic field, A is the area that the motor's magnetic field encompasses, ω is the angular velocity, and t is time. Notice that N, B, and A are all constants specific to the motor construction. They never change unless some dramatic entropy is going on. At that point, BEMF detection is the least of your concerns. Aside from the sinusoidal nature of the signal, BEMF is directly proportional to motor speed and nothing else.[/size]
[size=78%]The following equation clearly describes the relationship between motor torque and motor current: T=[(PN)/2π)]φI, where T is torque, N is the number of coil turns, P is the number of poles, φ is the flux, and I is the current. Note again that current and torque are directly proportional to each other. Other factors, including voltage and the temperature's dependence on the resistivity of copper, can increase or decrease the motor current, which in turn affects the total available torque. However, they do not change the torque-to-current relationship.[/size]

[wings]

another viewpoint:
"This is the mechanical overunity motor of Tarieal Kapanadze Part 1. In the German translation it is said, that it also used gravitation. But I guess it just only uses the inertia of the 2 disc. It is said, that the 2 disc are of steel and brass or maybe each disc a double layer of steel and brass and that these disc are connected via a brass wire, that is isolated from the steel shaft."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3thvqFhFIfY#t=60

not two capacitor plates but two rotating mass with a torsional spring that give rotational oscillation of the two disc like the oscillating pendulum the explanation in the middle of this page
http://tarielkapanadze.ru/kelly5-2.htm

Chas Cambel have large Flywheel System and long transmission chain that give same torsional oscillation effect gap and transmission delay help the oscillation
http://www.overunity.com/12464/using-chas-cambel-flywheel-system-for-15-horsepower/dlattach/attach/112139/image//

Raoul Hatem's heretical statement is that using spinning magnets coupling that probably give rotational oscillation vibration
http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/Ch2/Fig30.jpg
from
http://www.free-energy-info.tuks.nl/Chapt2.html


http://www.edn.com/design/analog/4368829/Back-EMF-method-detects-stepper-motor-stall
Universal motor concepts
[size=78%]Back-EMF method detects stepper-motor stall figure 6BEMF is directly proportional to angular velocity, or armature speed, and motor torque is directly proportional to motor current. The following equation clearly illustrates the relationship between angular velocity and BEMF: BEMF=−N×B×A×ω×sin(ωt), where N is the number of coil turns, B represents the magnetic field, A is the area that the motor's magnetic field encompasses, ω is the angular velocity, and t is time. Notice that N, B, and A are all constants specific to the motor construction. They never change unless some dramatic entropy is going on. At that point, BEMF detection is the least of your concerns. Aside from the sinusoidal nature of the signal, BEMF is directly proportional to motor speed and nothing else.[/size]
[size=78%]The following equation clearly describes the relationship between motor torque and motor current: T=[(PN)/2π)]φI, where T is torque, N is the number of coil turns, P is the number of poles, φ is the flux, and I is the current. Note again that current and torque are directly proportional to each other. Other factors, including voltage and the temperature's dependence on the resistivity of copper, can increase or decrease the motor current, which in turn affects the total available torque. However, they do not change the torque-to-current relationship.[/size]

more http://cursos.itcg.edu.mx/libros/Libros%20y%20Manuales%20de%20Ingenieria/Engineering%20Books/Harris__Shock_And_Vibration_Handbook/HARRIS~1.-HA/70811_38.pdf
http://www.engdyn.com/images/uploads/65-torsional_vibration_analysis_-_jcw&frs.pdf

[Pirate88179]

You are the one making the claims. So I say "prove it".

I have made no claims.  I am repeating the laws of physics which have been proven over and over again.  If YOU are making a claim that those laws are wrong, then it is YOU that must prove it.  IF you are able to do so, then your Nobel prize awaits.

Bill