Using Chas Cambel Flywheel System For 15 Horsepower

[ramset]

Brad
When you click on your link the Handsome Chinese fellow staring you in the face is Laurence Tseung
Thats Larry.....[Laurence ,,,quite a character at times ]


however I see the rest of that link gets into the other replications .


I was taught just as you were {although we did not really have Belts on the planes I worked on]
All your comments regarding belts make complete sense.


The fellows have a theory and it "Revolves" around  putting a pulse in their system ... and then they are hoping for an oscillation with gain to set in?
This would be an interesting concept if it works ..tapping the mechanical system in some fashion that it achieves an output beyond the apparent input I suppose?

Just like you I hope they do it and I am Grateful they are willing to give it a try and share their results.


the
Chet

[Pirate88179]

Chet:

Where is Lawrence? I hope he is OK.  We have not heard from him for a while.  I never agreed with his theories but, he was always very positive in pushing them and I respected that.

Bill

[tinman]

@ Chet
Im sorry Chet,but your friends theories are full of hole's.
Example-Quote:This fact has recently been stressed by Lawrence Tseung who refers to the extra energy obtained in this way as being "Lead-out" energy. This gravitational feature has been part of university Engineering courses for decades, where it has been taught that the loading stress on a bridge caused by a load rolling across the bridge is far less than the stress caused if that same load were suddenly dropped on to the bridge.

Sounds good,but he failed to take into account the energy required to lift the load in the first place-so as the load could be dropped onto the bridge.This energy is an additive to the impack the load has on the bridge. If you take the energy required to lift the load,and place that energy in form of an inpact on the load rolling accross the bridge,the force placed on the bridge would be the same.

Once again-every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

The one about an impact drive propelling a canoe is actualy suppose to be an inertial drive unit.
Think about how an ice or roller skater propels them self,and you will see how this work's.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx4LT3GZjlY&list=PLoUT4a5Zlf7GeW9OODUuqpcrrvsQ1uZ31

I am seeing no magic in any of these systems yet.

[a.king21]

Tinman:  How do you know that every action equals an equal and opposite reaction?
Because some guy hundreds of years ago said so?

[ramset]

Bill
Lawrence still updates his thread At Overunity research ,I know he had some health issues ,but he keeps busy.
@Brad
Suppose their intuition is Right?,especially since it goes against everything we Know [or think we Know]....


I have to say when I read the story of Tesla's "incident' in Down town manhattan with his little Tappy thing, It does give me pause
I spent Ten years knocking Down Buildings In NYC and those old Buildings Down town were not to be taken lightly[quite the opposite ]
If I only had a little "Tappy thing"  I would probably still be in that business [It was a Brutal BiZ]


And please don't imagine some tall drink a water ,spindly, wiggly frail structure  when you ponder this building and that story
Uh -UH they cross braced and over built "sky scrapers" [anything over 3 stories in those days],they were going into uncharted territory and took extra precautions during construction so as not to be embarrassed by the naysayers.


And Yes I completely understand the resonance perspective ,however I think if you added up The little Taps and then you figured a way to harness all the energy in that building that was  put in motion  by those Taps and transfer that energy to one big event ??


As Batman Used to Say


POW ....
Have you ever been hit with a skyscraper 

Perhaps we have missed something??
No stone left unturned ?


Thx
Chet