Patent from 1920 that look's like "coler stromerzeuger"

[lancaIV]

.

[lancaIV]

Resin to plastics and this formed to a comb.
This comb throu(gh) a.dry b.wet hair :effect ? Voltage


Biological carbon/graphit cell/-ular/-ulosic textile : Hostalen Cellophan ~ graphene

Walking with plastic shoe-soles on a plastic carpet and then touching a metall piece or an human body-part( f.e. ear  ): what happens ?
                                                                                Burst/Up-/down-loading
                                                                                Coulomb-forces

analog: http://amasci.com/emotor/emotor.html

Aluminium: Skin-effect
http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/electromagnetic.pdf

Proof of the Available But Neglected Heaviside Energy Flow Component
To prove the ubiquitous existence of the Heaviside energy flow component, and to
demonstrate that it can easily be tapped, one can refer to Bohren's [32] demonstration that a
resonant particle collects and emits up to 18 times as much energy as is input to it by
conventional accounting (that is, in the Poynting component of the true energy input).
Resonant particle absorption and emission is a COP > 1.0 process already proven and
standard in the literature for decades; e.g., see the pioneering work by Letokhov [15]. The
effect reported by Bohren was confirmed and verified, e.g., by Paul and Fischer [33].
Bohren, Paul, Fischer, and other electrodynamicists are unaware that their energy input
actually included the huge unaccounted Heaviside energy flow component as well as the
accounted Poynting flow defined by reaction with a static unit point charge.
The reason for the COP > 1.0 in this process is that the resonant particle sweeps out a
greater geometrical reaction cross section in the total energy flow than is included in
Poynting's theory for a standard static particle's interception. In short, it proves that the
neglected Heaviside component is present and can be readily intercepted to obtain real
expendable energy. We did a back-of-the-envelope calculation for the relative magnitude in
a simple DC circuit of the Heaviside component compared to the Poynting component. The
neglected Heaviside component for a nominal simple circuit was on the order of 1013 times as
great in magnitude as the feeble Poynting component. A more exact calculation would be
welcomed, but we could not locate such a calculation in the literature [34]




http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19281115&CC=GB&NR=300311A&KC=A


How and much/many in-/de-creasing Voltage ?
How and much/many in-/de-creasing Ampére ?
How and much/many in-/de-creasing Ohms ?


http://amasci.com/miscon/elect.html