Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Electrolysis101 PDF Download

Started by Brian Coats, August 11, 2012, 08:04:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Brian Coats

I wasn't ready to share this because it's nowhere near finished, But anyways have a look at it until I finish it.


(OH I KNOW THAT)And the carbon element reveals itself!> It helps, it isn't pure but its 90% the container is the size of a golf ball


Imagine a cup full of gas taking you 1000 miles. Same post can be found http://open-source-energy.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=669[/size] or  http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,2467.5.html  and I posted our link there as well. This is what the technology had to offer, this is what its about! The videos arent fake they just dont show everything. Now look in the right places and face the facts, Start piecing it together and get it finished! From here you'll have to use your mind to draw the schematics, its not on paper but there are paper trails, small ones. There is a paper trail in the video as well. Anyone with a mechanical mind can take this information and put it to work. Its similar to a geet but the geet doesn't quite cut it. A new synthetic fuel is born!

Brian Coats

That was extracted from that video yes. When you do so it runs, The goal was to use water instead of petrol, the secret was closely guarded and shunted to a stand still with you know what! Stans goal was to reduce petrol consumption by over 75% using this system. The element Hydrogen is used in rockets, we are after a synthetic fuel that contains Hydrocarbons which is what the synthetic fuel produces. You need more than the hydrogen element, you need carbon as well and as I said in the PDF, Carbon Reactors can last for very long times, 3+ years in some cases. Stan was using petrol to produce a synthetic gas, I am unsure of the gas because I'm unsure how many carbon atoms bonds with the hydrogen when the Hydroxy gas is passed threw the Carbonated reactor.  Sorry If I popped anyones bubble here, But you'll get over it and get with it. Did you miss the parts where you can add a steady flow of air to the generators to increase gas output? The car was running off of a ("Hydrocarbon") gas, but what kind of hydrocarbon gas is the question.To everyone; Please think before you bash, I will not post nothing else if that happens. 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx9fxChPEH8&feature=player_embedded

Brian Coats

No I dont "Think" he used the petrol bubbler.  ("I know he did.") The technology could only be used on pure water when he stored the hydrogen, gas on demand used the bubbler. Stan told you to introduce Ambient air and exhaust gases into the generator, I have that in my pdf as well. You need to use an air pump at a regulated flow depending on the production. Ambient air and CO2 makes no difference, They both support full combustion while using nothing causes incomplete combustion of the hydroxy flame which is why the flame is orange in color. Lye further causes incomplete combustion but by adding ambient air it can be tuned to a more complete combustion to the point it can be so clean the flame can go out. We already know that we can (Create) Lye using electrolysis without having to actually add it into the water. We also have chlorine to boot. Proof of chlorine can be seen by using a DIE in the water, then using a Lye to revive it. Too much to point my finger at here. Much has been overlooked and hidden away, but it cant be hid forever!!!I'm sure stans goal was 100% water, But what we witnessed in that one video where the tank was in the grass, He was borrowing the carbon atom from the (Golf ball sized Anti Splash Resovor.) Gases contain Carbon, They're hydrocarbon gases and stans bug was running on a hydrocarbon gas mix he called a (Synthetic fuel.) Synthetic means man made and those exact words are also found in one of stans patent, I think the patent can be found in my last pdf posted on the 3 phase rotoray conversion process where he used 3 phase electrical current onboard the bug. Too bad he did not have a Digital Power inverter back then ehh,,, would've saved him lots of time. It doesn't matter how its produced as long as you mix it properly. It will run on water, not 100% water but damn close! Stan did have it run 100% on water but, he could not go very far! The rest is hogwash.


The Below video was Borrowing Carbon elements from the Hydrocarbon Propane. Results a new synthetic gas as well since the carbon seems to attatch itself to the H element. A small squirt of carbon can go a long way!

Fester

I have a few questions about this. Mind you I am a car guy and not a chemist. But after reading what you have posted a few times, these are the questions that come to mind.

Question 1: Would not using petro as a bubble defeat the purpose of a bubbler? Bubblers from what I understand, give an inert material to block backflash( backfire) from reaching the generator. Not that a second bubbler could not be added.

Question 2: Would not motor oil be a better choice for the carbon bubbler? Motor oil has more carbonates than gasoline. But it also has more contaminates. Some scary ones like chlorine. And of course I have no idea what could be centrifuged out and what is actually a molecular bond.

Question 3: What burns in the engine is actually gasoline vapor. It would seem more productive to slightly heat the gasoline. This would encourage more vapor production. I would tend to think an unstable vapor would bond easier than with a fluid. what has your research turned up in the way gasoline vapor bonds with certain thing?

Question 4: Are you also looking into what hydrocarbon structures could actually end result in a HHO enriched fluid state after cooling? This would bring a reactive gas to a more stable state for storage. Basically a back yard refinery if you catch my drift.

Brian Coats

What my main view is all the (Other) Hydrocarbon fuels from ethane all the way up the scale to other well known hydrocarbon fuels. Gases! We know that each gas containes Hydrogen and Carbon elements and that by determining how many hydrogen elements bond with the carbon elements we can tell what sorta fuel it is.

During electrolysis We produce both hydrogen and Oxygen elements, And we have found that by adding Ambeient air into the mix that this action Absoarbes the oxygen element produced. We are now left with the hydrogen element that is ready to bond with anything that passes by as it is seeking to share an electron. We know what when this element gets around carbon an synthetic fuel should be born leaving us with a synthetic gas much like Propane, or any of the other gases containing both H and C. There is a Chart in my Pdf somewhere taken from the net that shows how many carbon atoms and Hydrogen atoms it takes to make 1 certain Type of gas.

I have been about to collect a very high amount of Water created by burting this mix into an engine, and one person stood up and stated how a car would continue to run by re introducing the collected water vapour back into the intake of the system. Stan was ask about this and he quickly changed the subject. It can be seen in one of his videos.

WE ALL HAVE TO UNDERSTAND HERE, what we are working with is 2 (((2))) Elements.

1. Hydrogen ELEMENT
2. Oxygen ELEMENT

We are not working with a (MOLECULE) and we are not burning a Molecule, Unless that molecule is either water, or a Hydrogen Molecule.

We are trying to find new ways to introduce Carbon to the Element Hydrogen Produced to Create either A NEW synthetic gas, OR, an synthetic gas that we are already aware of. We do not know the case yet. We know that by bubbling Propane From the bottom of the fuel cell we can create this synthetic gas, But we havent given any further investigation to it yet.

Right now, We are also working on a Direct Injection Of HHO while causing the other (Other) direct injection of Water Vapour to convert directly into steam which allows the piston to be pushed downward.

We are doing everything that we can possibly do to debunk every single possible tech in this system.

We know for a fact that stans word of producing gas from his freq generator was just a write off to what was really going on. Stan was doing something that is not or has not been spoke on.

I would like to add, there are several ways you can inject carbon into the hho stream and there are several techniques that can be used to Consume up the Oxygen element in the HHO mix with Ambeint air being introduced being one of them. Ambeint are contains 78% nitrogen as well as other gases that we are still not aware of. We have found Ambient air to not be much different from CO2. Infact, in comparason it shows no difference to the effect of the burn rate. Where A very small amount of Propane Creates a very large (Unexplainable) Reaction to the HHO produced.

We are currently working on direct injection into ICE as well. We are also researching why the Bubbles from the Produced HHO ontop the water acts differently when lite comparted to the way it acts when lit after its been sent down a tunneled lineset like an hho torch. It seems that there are things here we do not udnerstand that well.

We also are dealing with several differnt types of water, We have Anything from 0 to 14 pH levels meaning anything from Acidic to Neutrual to Basic then Alkaline. These types of water Depending on the type of water it is may either repel electrons or Attract them greatly. This is the side of the technology that has not been researched at all and it should be. Nobody even knows the difference between Acidic water and Alkiline water, Isn't this sad? It all (Looks like the same water) but it isn't.

They guys putting LYE or caustic soda in there water should be (Creating their own) Caustic soda right in there fuel cells. (They do not know how to do it or they would be.)

Clearly,,,, Clearly,,,,, This Electrolysis Process is NOT understood.

Electrolysis of Salt water, NACL produces Caustic Soda, Lye Sodium Hydroxide and Chlorine and Hydrogen. Why is this information Not being in the eyes?

As of right now, I have stoped work on the Carbonated Reactor and I have Continued work on the Direct injection of Hydrogen Causing a tiny amount of Water vapour to be vaporized into steam, where when you convert a water droplet to steam the force is greated than the Explosion of HHO!

It is a slow process,,, working alone is not fun, But you can not work with a FOOL that is looking for 20KiloHrtz per second to give you hydrogen from water for free! And if you had the damn hydrogen from water,,,,,,,,

ITS JUST A DAMN ELEMENT, WE DONT BURN ELEMENTS STUPID! WE BURN SYNTHETIC GASES,, Wake TFUP!