Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[Pascuser]

Dear Pascuser,
could you please ,like you kindly proposed ,give the address of the institute that made the measurements ?
I want to write them a letter about their test series concerning the device.
Thank you in advance

Dear xenomorphlabs,

Thank you for a real interest in investigating. I was afraid overunity forums was only full of Trolls having the main occupation in debunking and chatting only; critic with no other foundation than being a Troll willing to discourage anybody to dig in the subjectc (the exact definition of a Troll).

So a serious reaction like yours is pretty interesting. Nobody asked to investigate before, and nobody seems to have seen the videos of experimentations here.
I yet wrote the name of the institute in the french document autogenerateur_1.pdf as you will find it. In french, I understand it to be difficult for you to find.
So I give it again:
"Ecole Polytechnique de Lausanne", in Swiss. it is a high school (university). I don't know the exact name of the service, it was a person working in the department concerning radio waves and sound, physic measurement service, who did it. This was done in 2007 I think. It was organised by Richard VIALLE's sponsors to have a measurement done in a professional environement. I don't know the sponsors name  but the Richard VIALLE's name is the key to seek.

You can have something more interesting: doing it at home. I made a video with the COP>1 measurement last sunday, as indicated in a previous post. J-L Naudin published my videos. So you have the exact way to do the measurement by yourself, you can watch the voltage indicators in my video, what I did and how, what I got, and do the same in your home; if you have a PC based oscilloscope or ground decoupled oscillocope. What I did is what was done is Lausanne, Swiss: a measurement with oscilloscope with a metal resistance (no leakage  inductance); so the same method.

The videos I yet spread here (only Troll reaction up to now); maybe you will find interest because you really investigate:
http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=922&view=findpost&p=23667
http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=922&view=findpost&p=23672
To better understand, you should use google translation to read my experiment report accompagnying the work, because there is no subitle for my videos. You can understand what is in the video with my written comments (with automatic google translation):
http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=922

Troll: 1 - Serious searcher: 1  ---> balanced
Other serious people here to change the balance a little more in the good direction?

[TheCell]

@Pascuser


I have seen 'Interview - Richard VIALLE: Part 10 & Part 11' where he introduces the U-Shape device powered by an op-amp and this op-amp by a battery and claims negative power would load that battery. These oscillators consume power whether the device connected to them is OU or not.
But if power is floating back to the source, it is eventually enough to power an LC-Tank at the input side; simply feed the C with an initially voltage. When the load is connected to the U-Shape it should run.


@conradelectro : people like naudin and pascuser contribute to the OU-subject . I mean we should give them time to prove it. There are people who canÃ,,t contribute , because of the lack of skills and another mean posters here that destract on purpose. (I am sick of them)

[Pascuser]

Thank you TheCell

If you are interested in this device and have some measurement material, then investment will be a little only: a copper tube and a wire for windings, so don't hesitate to do it.

I have some last informations concerning the loop device. There was a switcher piloting the amplifier so that negative power from the U autogenerateur recharges the battery powering the whole system.

This is schematic fort switcher and amplifier to control the U:
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/279112decoupeurmisenforme.jpg
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/217266amplificateurmiseenforme.jpg

Later, transistor 2SC2312 changed specifications and negative power could not come back from the amplifier with this amplifier. Only old 2SC2312 stocks (or 2SC1969) were working. Replacing it with a new one didn't work. The resistor Rce changed  and became nearby infinite in new spec and it was the imperfection Rce not infinite that allowed a negative power return in this amlplifier set up.

But MOSFET transistors have this imperfection of Rce not infinite (but much less than 2SC2312 at the time... Rce is great in MOsfet) and you have negative power with it (but much less!!). So use another amplifier with a MOSFET driver to connect to the switcher, unless this won't work. If you have 2SC2312 from before 2007 then the last schematic will work fine!!

Here are tests done with this last schematic (old 2SC2312) but Richard ex-sponsors: output was charging a 12V battery pack while 24V battery pack powering the oscillator + amplifier + switcher was charging too (with negative power return):
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/243674charge1miseenforme.jpg
http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/685334charge2miseenforme.jpg

[conradelektro]

Mr. Jean Louis Naudin is showing some very interesting results:

http://jnaudin.free.fr/rvproject/html/ugentest21.htm

It is not easy to generate the 3.6 MHz sinusoidal signal necessary to run the U-shaped generator coil (needs a signal generator and a HF amplifier).

Not counting the cost of generating the input signal, there seems to be more power coming out of the U-shaped contraption than is put in.

Naudin's measurements:

Wattage of the sinusoidal 3.6 MHz signal fed into the U-shaped generator is 4.5 Watt (input).

Current through the lamp is 6.4 Watt (output).

The measurements and the experiment need some impressive array of equipment, because the 3.6 MHz signal has to be carefully tuned and measured (true RMS).

Naudin substracts losses due to the characteristic wave impedance (Wellenwiderstand, Reflexion) of the input coil from the input Wattage, but this detail (0.6 Watt) does not seem to matter too much given the significant difference between input and output.

This becomes interesting, because the set up and the measurements are very carefully done and documented. There also seems to be a lot of room for improvements (size of and material used for the U-shaped generator).

Greetings, Conrad

[conradelektro]

It gets even better, Mr. Jean Louis Naudin has demonstrated real OU:

http://jnaudin.free.fr/rvproject/html/ugentest22.htm

Input 19 Watt (including the losses in the HF amplifier).

Output 31.2 Watts (over a resistor).

This is the best OU result I have ever seen on any OU forum. And it is well documented. The measurements are done very carefully with professional equipment.

It is hard to see a flaw in this OU experiment. I am a sceptic, but what I see there amazes me.

One does not have to know French to understand the photos, diagrams and numbers on Naudin's web site.

Greetings, Conrad