Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[tim123]

Hi Khwartz
  I've seen your efforts on the other forum to get info from people. Thank you.

I have a plan for a replication, image attached. It's Richard's V1 gen - the straight one...

I want to use a straight, and short coil so i can try 2 ferrite cores (which I have) inside the copper tubes. I'd also like to try folded lengths of wire - like JLN did - and see how that changes the resonance.

The total length for the coil would be 1/3m - 330mm. With each tube at 150mm.

I will power it from my DC bench power supply, using a ZVS driver - designed for induction heating - to drive the tank circuit (capacitor not shown in diagram). I have used this arrangement before and it works well...

But - I'm not sure about the resonant frequency I should expect for the two 150mm tubes - and if it's very high, I may need to use fewer turns for the coil...

So - if you could dig out that formula for me? That would be very helpful...

Thanks, Tim

[Khwartz]

I never got any responses...


wasn't the primary project the two bars; of which one bar can be removed, and the other bar removed, and be left with clips just inside the thing with no metal, right?

Richard original experience was made with a straight plain barre of copper, that why indeed we continue to speak about "barre" for the two halves of metal core even when it is a pipe.

Yes, both halves could be removed in his first experiment but it has the purpose to be able to know the ideal distance they were supposed to be separated,  now we know it can start from millimeters to centimeters.

And yes, if I remember well, even clips functioned in the air of the extrimities of the coil

[Khwartz]

@tim123

I can't believe no one thought to post a link to Richard's website...

Dear tim123, we were not about to share links to French pages but to translate them, and the web-site about Richard is not Richard's one but indeed BlueDragon one, I would say, for Richard. The translation were supposed to be published on the web site too. But I cannot translate everything in one time! Lol

True that Google can make a pretty good job, but it will have hard time with expressions. Could be I will use. Until now I didn't cause for appropriate translation needs to understand first the principles that Google will never be able

Two threads could be interesting: the replications of Colas, which is advanced stuff where he is looking for creating the "avalanche" of power by looking for systematically the right frequency

http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?s=1875e5c1fd575d82c78b7170a6438d0b&showtopic=941

and the BlueDragon's topic, where it is the basic experiment at its start

http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?s=1875e5c1fd575d82c78b7170a6438d0b&showtopic=1476

Best regards.

[Khwartz]

Hi Khwartz
  I've seen your efforts on the other forum to get info from people. Thank you.

I have a plan for a replication, image attached. It's Richard's V1 gen - the straight one...

I want to use a straight, and short coil so i can try 2 ferrite cores (which I have) inside the copper tubes. I'd also like to try folded lengths of wire - like JLN did - and see how that changes the resonance.

The total length for the coil would be 1/3m - 330mm. With each tube at 150mm.

I will power it from my DC bench power supply, using a ZVS driver - designed for induction heating - to drive the tank circuit (capacitor not shown in diagram). I have used this arrangement before and it works well...

But - I'm not sure about the resonant frequency I should expect for the two 150mm tubes - and if it's very high, I may need to use fewer turns for the coil...

So - if you could dig out that formula for me? That would be very helpful...

Thanks, Tim

Good project!

For the formula, I cannot help you directly, I need to ask Pascuser who is Master in physics. I don't have the technical skills in maths to up to this level.

But Pascuser has done spreadsheets with the standard formulas and caracteristics, but as soon as you change something, not sure then you can really use it. As Woppy noted, it has been found very sensitive to the variation of very little details and he abandonned because he had not the tools to be more precise. Colas has few good tools and looks for a way indeed to systematically found the right frequency. Look at these diagrams in this page (date " Samedi 28 Décembre 2013 à 22h36):

http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=941&st=480

[Khwartz]

The "negative power" is obtained while using the Pascuser's spreadsheet you will find just after:

"R : La puissance négative s'obtient lorsque les éléments suivants sont réunis :

1/ Le système est conçu suivant les caractéristiques calculés dans le fichier Excel  :"

In this page:

http://richard-vialle.info/index.php/articles/systemes-exprmt/15-auto-generateur-richard-vialle-faq

Good luck for the Google translation ;)