Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[hartiberlin]

Hi Pascuser and Khwartz,

please calm down and stop to fight here.

Well, sounds funny to me, but I am not a member of any secret service or
party.
I just run this website just as my hobby, but in this moment I just don´t have so
much time to read all the threads, cause I need to work and also am working on
my own projects...

So please calm down and just be friendly to each other...

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[Khwartz]

I hadn't noticed!

Not at all...

I'm just looking at options for connecting the DDS output to the MOSFET:
a) Opto isolator. Quite like this idea... Can get some on ebay (£1 each) that'll go up to 10Mbs - which would be a 5MHz Square wave...
b) Differential amplifiers... Another possibility...

Of course, I realised that if I use either of these - I can use my PC-based sig-gen... But it was cool getting the arduino working, and I'm still working on the VNA idea...

I saw that Colas was using a MiniVNA on his U-gen... That's a cool bit of equipment.


Tim

Indeed! For the miniVNA

For the rest, you know I absolutly and fully ... incompetent

[Khwartz]

Hi Pascuser and Khwartz,

please calm down and stop to fight here.

Well, sounds funny to me, but I am not a member of any secret service or
party.
I just run this website just as my hobby, but in this moment I just don´t have so
much time to read all the threads, cause I need to work and also am working on
my own projects...

So please calm down and just be friendly to each other...

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

Lol, nice to see you take it so cool, while you were the one who was difamed! Indeed.

Well, I have reported what I had to report (as my job any way in this thread is to report, it doesn't change ); so very nice if we can go further now

Best regards to you, and thanks again for this forum you run,
K.

[Khwartz]

A more interesting report:

As per the terms of use and licence which folow,

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/fr/deed.en


I will translate progressively the "FAQ" of the website

http://richard-vialle.info/~richardv/


Here is the FAQ page (in French of course):

http://richard-vialle.info/~richardv/index.php/articles/systemes-exprmt/15-auto-generateur-richard-vialle-faq


The English version to come soon, but item by item 

B.R.
K.

[Khwartz]

Lol, looks someone can't restrain him to do exactly what he exactly complained about the community here: to give altered and misleading informations

Just only one example: he says I had issues with justice, well, it is an easything in France to know that if it true or not, as we can ask the paper to the State. I will send my empty one to you, Stefan, if the previous contradictor sends to you his own, and you will be able to attest who is a liar (or not so bright IQ)

Just one note more, cause I sense like a strategy to engage me in an unlimited discussion to ruin my time and disgusting people here of this thread:

It is true I have very insisted that the community there anwers the questions asked here. This is not a secret cause, contrary to Pascuser statement ("contrary" would it mean a "lie" here too? ), I did have written in English in a thread the Community there has indeed created in this purpose, it is even name "[Special] Khwartz - proxy informatif avec Overunit". Lol! According to his previous words, I was nor encouraged to publish here nor supported by the Community there?

For the "kWs", I remember you one of my previous "technical report" here, where I specified that Biganos is working on the purpose to obtain more power, and I have never written here the kW had been produced, only a "theoretical possibility" and even saying that the theory itself needs to be bettered cause it doesn't predict with full accuracy the experimental results; my words can be checked very easily here anyway. So, up to you to conclude yourself on is willness to respect the truth here

Many words, indeed, imho, just to try to make us forgotten HE was THE ONE who difamed (he difamed Stefan and The Community here), and that I had the courage to strictly report them (even with the original words in French! if you noticed) DESPITE his very very verulent threats in legal issues (copies of his mails still available, and of his injures too! ).


Sadly enough, Pascuser "needs" to justify his infamous words to the Community here I've testified, not allows me to report the materials of his "private" website (didn't he write something like that in his post?  ) Conspirovniscience.com, but I should still be able to report from

http://richard-vialle.info/

I have already up-load the most useful materials anyway and we have some materials too in JLN's website.

You may copy paste here any extract for purpose of more accurate translation than the automatics available on web.

Don't know if BlueDragon will continue to update the "proxi/mirror thread" there, but he was engaged in a nice job of harvesting the data spread in the French community so I could publish it here with translations and explanatory comments.

I hope he will continue to do so in the thread he indeed created for me, I've just mentioned before:

"[Special] Khwartz - proxy informatif avec Overunit"

so that he could keep you all update (like that our friend Pascuser will be satisfied to drain more traffic ).

I would invite you all anyway to follow BlueDragon own thread of replication (but don't be hurry, he could take his time I mean months the time to have a good equipment for), cause he was very engaged to produce the best quality procedures for measurements (under zgreudz checking if he agrees), and knowing him a little bit, I know it will be done with the maximum of rigour and honesty ("kiss" to you Blue ).

I remember you too that it is "zgreudz" there who is skills in measurements: the very skills of the specialist engineer in measurements he is indeed ("Zgreudz" here, but looks he not used to post in ou.com).

BTW, you know what? It is very at the moment I have proposed to run a laboratory like procedure of certifying the resluts obtained by the different replicators there, so yes I could report here only valid results, that things screwed up; do you realise that?!

It was a proposition consisting to use the very skills of each one of the most experienced in the Autogenetator, to reach a good enough level of certification of the resuls (see, a very ugly proposal, right? ).

For example, as Pascuser is obviously skill in physics and maths, I have proposed him to check the calculations, while of course zgreudz would have checked the procedures of measurements. All this very unlogical as you can see, but all to ensure YOU here, to get true valid data once I would have reported them.

Looks the true problem has been that I have proposed a work they hardly felt able to do (of course I sent copies of my PMs while several persons needed to agree - here too, a very "unlogical" behaviour from me! ), while they are for most, already on tasks taken them already too much of their time: following all the possible replications there, or to recheck the existing, and yes, would be a very huge work indeed.

I think the opposition in the two interests: their actual tasks and my proposal, made them screwed up; or would it be for few of them they apprehended the risk to demonstrate too much errors in the previous procedures?

I would very doubt about BlueDragon cause I think I have well perceived is integrity (and very nice behaviour ), nor from zgreudz, cause he looks very very professional in his way and didn't be afraid to publish his own "no results" on overunity tries (the why I came to insist having a system of "certification" of the measurement procedures, and for the device itself, because I saw it could still have few - indeed rather few - boubts on several results published and that I have reported).

I don't say there was not overunity but just that as you know, but I repeat on purpose: "extraordinary claims needs extraordinary proof" (yes, but note that is doesn't means necessarily any "professional tools": if you self run something, you selfrun it! you don't need any instrument for this, except could be a clock! ).

Okay, this post is long enough! ^^ I hope next one will be for a new "TR" ("Technical Report"), and the first Q&A of the site about Richard's work translation. (To not distract of the true purpose of this thread ).

B.R.
K.