Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[Khwartz]

Hi Khwartz,
  thanks for your translations.

This explains why the guys on COS were testing whether batteries spontaneously recharged when near the autogen. I saw a vid...

So the batteries did 'discharge' when powering the device, and after 5 hours had a lower voltage.
At this point they were swapped - but they just needed a 'rest' - and did not actually need to be recharged. Interesting.

Regards, Tim

Hi tim

Hehe, nope! Lol

You confuse the description of how a battery works, while we suppose it runs few hours, then been stopped to make it rests and "repolarises" (means that the battery "re-balances" its chemicals inside and does raise back its voltage to 23.5 V). But all this is NORMAL process without the RAG.

How it worked with the RAG and the 2 batteries, as I have understood it, it's about 2 kinds of systems:

1. It is just a very specific transistor or kind of, which allows, by a "virtual resistance", an imperfection in the building of (by the fabric), the negative energy to go through the electronic to feed back a single battery.

2. A kind of alternative system which feeds some energy in the RAG one time with the first battery (we could call "exciting time") and a second time while the first battery is disconnected to fully allow the negative power to "sail up" to the second battery (we could call it "charging time").

Could be both were used.

That's why we near all advise in the French community, to go by gradients in the replication:

1. Obtention of the lit of the light bulb and verify by oneself it was function of the frequency injected;

2. Obtention of a decrease of power consumption at the imput of the bar while we put it on load = production of "negative power";

3. Obtention of the maximisation of the COP until been "negative": the bar gives back more power than it takes;

4. Obtention of the recharge of a battery (or 2 alternatively) while still the bar lits the light bulb at maximum;

5. Obtention of the range of kilowatts (at the output of the bar or in the direction of the batteries?) with full bending, control, of the power.

These are the logical and progressive steps one should go through, to "not miss the essential" (as Biganos said, but in French ).

Note: if I remember well, the transistors (?) were "Toshiba" or "Mitsubishi", something like that, but for the little story, what I do remember well is that just after the sponsors were about to protect their circuit by a patent, the imperfection of the transistor have been corrected by the fabric to no more have the "virtual resistance" and couldn't no more allow the negative power to sail up through.

To be able to have a chance to do so, the French experimenters found old series of transistors dating before "the correction".

For the recharging phenomenon by only proximity, it looks like true too

Note that the "charge time", in the experiment, is mater of a hundred of minutes, not hours

And you're welcome for the translation

Best regards,
K.

----
Translation of the captions of the first attachment:

Mesure à vide 10 min avant.
• Measurement without load 10 minutes before.

Mesure à vide 5 min avant.
• Measurement without load 5 minutes before.

Fin de l'expérience.
End of experiment.

Début remontée batterie.
Beginning of the raising back of the battery.

Fin remontée batterie.
End of the raising back of the battery.

----
The second attachment is a version of a circuit used by the sponsor. It could allow negative power but looks this version was not still workable for the selfrun which looks have been acheived at the V10 version of 12 at the patent stage.

[Khwartz]

Guys, Ramset's just revived this old thread and posted a doc - which is very interesting...
http://www.overunity.com/647/lyne-atomic-hydrogen-furnace/msg387251/#msg387251

Right at the end it's selling another book, and says:

It made me wonder if the 'type 3' or 'avalanche' event in the autogen happens at *a specific voltage*...?

Thanks for this insisting datum, dear tim.

As far the Autogen is concerned, the French experimenters are clear: it is not a question of voltage but of amps (and frequency + tuning).

It is the shunt like system at the output of the bar which, by a high short-circuit current like, induces a magnetic field in the coil which then produces the negative power.

As you know already now, if any failure have been registered in the production of the first and second stages of effects, it was a failure to have enough power in imput to allow amps.

Nevertheless, from my own viewpoint, most, if not all experiments, have been done with rather law voltages so could be nice to make a systematic test of the voltage factor, against graph, duty cycle if drived with scare waves shapes. Still, it should not be done imo before the 3rd level of replication mastering.

Hope this will help you,

B.R.
K.

PS to my citizenmates of Conspirovnicience.com and the PROMTECNO Association (only 16 € a year to support it ): you may* correct me at anytime. No correction will be considered like a king of tacit agreement on my understanding of Richard's Autogenerator . (*: "may" mode for a suggestion or proposal;  the mode of an order is "must"  ).

[Khwartz]

Edirion error.

[verpies]

Are you suggesting that the angle between the individual resistors should be about 15 degrees (instead of parallel)?

Almost.
15 degrees twist angle would be optimal if one resistor was used...but since this CSR is composed out of 18 resistors, then the optimal twist angle would be different.

@Khwartz
I did not write that the construction of this CSR was flawed (1nH is pretty good already).  I merely wrote that it can be further improved. 
That graph shows that a coiled wire can have a lower inductance than a straight wire, which goes against the common wisdom.

[Khwartz]

Almost.
15 degrees twist angle would be optimal if one resistor was used...but since this CSR is composed out of 18 resistors, then the optimal twist angle would be different.

@Khwartz
I did not write that the construction of this CSR was flawed (1nH is pretty good already).  I merely wrote that it can be further improved. 
That graph shows that a coiled wire can have a lower inductance than a straight wire, which goes against the common wisdom.

Lol, now I think I get!

Indeed, I didn't realise the red dot ligne was straight wire!

Soo Well Seen! Indeed, dear verpies: according to this graph, a pitch angle of ~15° would be better than 0°! 

Good one!

Will need a try

Best regards,
K.