Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[tim123]

Despite the apparent physical impossibility of soldering the teeny bits together - it is done
It's not as hard as I thought - as long as you:
a) take your time
b) use plenty of flux
c) balance a small drop of solder on the tip of the iron
d) use both hands to steady the iron...

I've soldered the smoothing cap at the back. The 2 resistors are only low power - will see how they do... I just have to hook it up to the IRF450 now...

PS: It's so small, my camera can't get a decent pic - even in macro mode...

[verpies]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdlZ03-8MaA
R Vialle == Meyer/Mace

IF this is true, then the EM and/or acoustic frequency must coordinated with magnetic flux density and/or sound wavelength (like in a tuning fork).

Magic frequencies that are related only to the type of the gain medium (copper, brass, iron...) and that work for all devices, regardless of natural or artificial magnetic fields and sizes, are highly unlikely.

P.S.
French is a beautiful language but I can't understand what the author is saying in this video ;(

[Khwartz]

Below are some sample applications of the UCC27511 drivers for a totem-pole digital power amplifier driving a large transformer.
Warning: These circuits are not current limited thus they will blow up in the absence of the square input waveform.

Hi verpies.

Just for my own education as I know nothing in electronics and such circuits myself: what is the use of the double wiring (I mean the orange one) in this transformer?  Is this to use back efm?

BTW, thanks for the data you provide here, thanks for your help. For my concern I do learn things with what you bring ♡♡ even completely null in electronics 

Regards,
K.

[Khwartz]

R Vialle revue et corrigé by anonymous

from this video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdlZ03-8MaA

R Vialle == Meyer/Mace


http://www.overunity.com/4333/meyer-mace-isotopic-nmr-generator/#.Uv-UFKyweFA

@ verpies

This comment below could help you to understand more what it is was about in its main ideas.

For more specific I will study his website and see if anything would be relevant to be translated and shared here (if the author allows me, otherwise only "short excerpts for educational purpose" ).

@ tagor

Hi  tagor for this very interesting input

I had made myself the parallel between both systems.

What the Anonimus obviously forgets is that the cutting has a specific purpose, according to the experimenters of Cos.com: to very limit the "hot current" in the bar itself.

Remember:

"hot current" => Joule losses;  "cold current" => no Joule losses.

BTW, the verification of the usefulness of the cut in the midle of the bar is very easy to do: just have a try without and with the cut!

One experimenter has made the opposite: testing with many cuts. Need to find it back to report you the results to know if more cuts increase or decrease the efficiency.

Don't think Richard changed Michel Mayer work and just "change the packaging" as this Anonymous supposes. Richard looks have his theory first and only then after found experiences to prove his theory. The proof for me is there is no true polarisation system in the Richard's Autogen, while he would easy inspiring himself to enhance his own device.

But good to have different approaches to be able to compare the results; isn't?  So indeed: any relevant input is welcome! 

@ tim

Wow! So little!  Lol


Best regards,
K.

[tagor]

Hi  tagor for this very interesting input

I had made myself the parallel between both systems.

What the Anonimus obviously forgets is that the cutting has a specific purpose, according to the experimenters of Cos.com: to very limit the "hot current" in the bar itself.

Remember:

"hot current" => Joule losses;  "cold current" => no Joule losses.

BTW, the verification of the usefulness of the cut in the midle of the bar is very easy to do: just have a try without and with the cut!
K.

yess it is very important , see the MEg and the BITT

and on conspi the LABO work