Simple OU circuit developed, from Butch

[Dingus Mungus]

There is a a lot of inconsistancy on the definition of OU here...

I believe a CoP>1 system is OU. You get out more than you put in. Examples of this technology are solar, hydroelectric, or even heat pumps. We're all esentially hunting for new ways to harness the energy of nature. You can't deny that wind and water moving across a turbine generates power, it efficency may only be 20%, but but its 20% for free. Solar cells harness the collision of a photon and a electron rich conductor to generate voltage, yet neutron or IR collection has not been achieved. Nature has thousands of systems containing vast ammounts of unused energy and its all around us. The problem is moving away from tricks, scams, and junk technologies twards the aspiration of "hooking our machinery to the gears of nature". Now people here aren't interested in well established technologies for the most part. So the kinds of energy we're trying to tap is an unkown, so it would only violate physics untill we determined the energy type and its source.

The score is not really 0 on a whole... Just 0-0 between those two.
Energy thats discovered is later explained, so the score will always return to zero.
But I now of over a dozen examples of CoP>1 systems that are in developement.

I hope this helps de-skeptify this old thread...

~Dingus Mungus

[Freenrg4me]

Hi,

Dr.Stiffler is disclosing full details on how to build OU devices.

Plenty of people have built OU devices throughout history. Anyone that can discount that is not living in reality.

Butch, if you think that you are going to build an OU device and patent it as it works, you have no clue of the patent process. The military industrial complex owns the patent office and they will use what are called marching orders to take it from you, place you under a secrecy agreement and tell you to pound sand.

Don't thank that is true? Tell me the name of one OU inventor that filed a patent, got rich and lived happily ever after. You are in essence attempting to blackmail an organized crime syndicate.

The reason we do not have free energy is every time someone figures it out, they get greedy and forget the free part. In the end, we all get nothing.

Greed does not just destroy the Earth, it destroys us within.

Dr. Stiffler is capable of displaying two OU devices. How much is he asking for? Zero. One has to ask the question "Can he create free energy because he has the integrity to remember the free part?"

Glad to see you trying to build instead of sitting on the bench cheering or detracting as the less intelligent creatures tend to do. You are a player, keep playing. Now go play with barium ferrite, therein may lie your answer.

[ruin41]

You know this may come as a suprise to most of you but free energy is something that doesnt cost , but its never going to be free.
Anyone who ever actually got off their but and built something realises striaght away the cost of the device and then there is development etc ...it all costs money.
And yet thousands of people sit here do nothing except moan about the cost and beg for it to be free.

[ruin41]

Humbugger, your what went wrong idea is very good might save a lot of people a lot of time and money and i suspect that that sort of help is what most of us who actually build stuff came here for in the first place but alas it doesn't happen cause those who know don't want to tell you and the others will tell you but have no idea what they are on about ...catch 22.

OU is relatively easy it stems from the inherent bad design of motors these days, simply put the constraint of " the most power for the smallest size" is the exact opposite of the freedom of size restriction and the most efficient motor.
This means that by doing it slightly different you can achieve OU performance based on what is considered the "norm" for todays standards.

If you need an example consider a car engine ...why does it go twice as well when you put on a turbo or 2 ...simple it was never more than a couple of percent efficient to start with and the turbo improves this, the engine is in fact running in OU state putting out far more power for less than the same increase in consumption but it is not free energy.

Free energy is something that has output but no input and to be honest i thought butch would have sorted it by now ... i have seen him so close so many times ... someone must be pointing him the wrong way when he gets too close.

[R_weng777]

 I worked on my own over-unity machine for about five years based on Ezekiel wheels with both rotor and stator moving, the only way to go. But there's always a but.What? Light(electromagnetism0 when it strikes matter (protons ,neutrons ,earth) creates a Eletron-positron pair. Electrons and positrons are emitted at the earth poles ,traveling where? To the sun on the solor field lines? Any way when electrons and positrons collide they produce 2 quarks it takes three quarks to make matter(P,N) , One proton moves toward the sun the other to the galactic center, continuing fusion and planet and star formation, thus creating light.C=M/E. The circle is complete; not closed but open. Energy and matter is created through light, ad infinitum, the universe expands and produce stars forever. That's good for PMers right? Does this prove the conservation of energy or destroy it? Here's the thing; the higher the over-unity the more light is used, a mini-black. Most of the machines I've seen are not capable of that kind of efficiency, but it will happen. Stealing fire from the sun you know what happened to him. Or fire from heaven, sound familiar? The science is out there to prove this, but I'm not a mathematician. The solution then is to create your on fire(light).