Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Is joule thief circuit gets overunity?

Started by Neo-X, September 05, 2012, 12:17:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

poynt99

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 02, 2013, 07:52:59 AM
A rather obvious test would be to swap the probes between channels. If the noise follows the probe to the other channel, then you know the probe is bad. If it doesn't, then you know the scope's noisy channel is bad.
Lawrence, very easy to do as per TK's suggestion above.
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

ltseung888

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 02, 2013, 07:52:59 AM
A rather obvious test would be to swap the probes between channels. If the noise follows the probe to the other channel, then you know the probe is bad. If it doesn't, then you know the scope's noisy channel is bad.

Yet again I ask. How was the large voltage discrepancy noted during the probe compensation discussion resolved? What caused it, how did you correct it, and can we be assured somehow that it is in fact now corrected?
@TK

I just followed your advice and swapped the probes.  The result is the same.  So the problem most probably lies with the scope.

One of the boards you refered to showed unusual high voltage output and hence high COP.  My mistake was to return it to Mr. Zhou together with the "rejects".  His people "recycled" some components without a thorough investigation.  The rejects were replaced by good ones. 

Now I am keeping the rejects.  I do not have the expertise to indentify the problem.  So they are just being stored until I can find the right person to check them out.  If you are interested, I can send you some of these rejects and you can tell us what might be wrong with them.
Compressible Fluids are Mechanical Energy Carriers. Air is not a fuel but is an energy carrier. (See reply 1097)
Gravitational or Electron Motion Energy can be Lead Out via oscillation, vibration, rotation or flux change systems.  We need to apply pulse force (Lee-Tseung Pulls) at the right time. (See reply 1106 and 2621)
1150 describes the Flying Saucer.  This will provide incredible prosperity.  Beware of the potential destructive powers.

picowatt

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 02, 2013, 08:15:41 AM
Is there some reason why the DC offset issue can't be tested right now, at home, using a known low-voltage source?

For a first test, take a 10 megohm resistor and a 100K resistor and connect them in series. Hook both scope probes from one oscilloscope to the junction of the two resistors. Hook up a AA battery,  positive pole to the 10 meg free end and negative pole to the 100K free end. All probe references to the negative pole. Use an accurate DMM to measure the voltage between the junction of the resistors and the negative pole.

Now look at the voltages seen by each probe/channel combination. Obviously they should all be the same, and the same as the DMM measures. If there is an offset problem it should show up as a difference in the readings of the channel vs. the DMM. Mark your probes and swap them around on the scopes and channels..... 4 probes and 2 channels per scope means 12 tests per scope.  This might actually take you half-an-hour to perform the whole series.

(Check all probes are at 10x attenuation and that all channels are also set for 10x attenuation probes. Do not use the "default setup" or "auto" functions of the scope; set each channel for DC coupling, no BW limit, zero baseline on the center graticule (overlap both traces so that you can see any differences) and the appropriate vertical amp setting (20 mV/div if possible). The timebase setting shouldn't matter since you are measuring DC here. Set the trigger at the zero baseline.)

TK,

This is a good idea, however, the divider resistance should be lower to reduce errors.  With 10meg probes (10X probes and 1meg scope input) and using the 10meg/100K dividerstring, probe loading will produce way too much error.  Better to use a 1K and 10R resistor in series with the free ends across the battery to minimize errors due to probe loading.

Better yet, using 100R and 1R would allow his test measurement to be made with the probe connected to a resistance similar to the CSR's and in a similar voltage range.  A fresh AA battery can handle the ca. 15ma load of the 100R/1R string for an time adequate to make the measurement, or he could use his DC supply set to 1.5V.

PW

ltseung888

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 02, 2013, 08:15:41 AM
Is there some reason why the DC offset issue can't be tested right now, at home, using a known low-voltage source?.......

@TK

I do not have an accurate "known low voltage source " at home.  Since the problem appears to be with the Atten Scope and at least one of them is still under warranty, I shall get the manufacturer to check it out with their experts.

All my three Atten Scopes showed the crossing 0 reference line behavior.  If it were a bug, the manufacturer would be and should be interested.  They need to fix it or provide a solution for their customers.
Compressible Fluids are Mechanical Energy Carriers. Air is not a fuel but is an energy carrier. (See reply 1097)
Gravitational or Electron Motion Energy can be Lead Out via oscillation, vibration, rotation or flux change systems.  We need to apply pulse force (Lee-Tseung Pulls) at the right time. (See reply 1106 and 2621)
1150 describes the Flying Saucer.  This will provide incredible prosperity.  Beware of the potential destructive powers.

poynt99

Quote from: ltseung888 on May 02, 2013, 05:16:41 PM
All my three Atten Scopes showed the crossing 0 reference line behavior.  If it were a bug, the manufacturer would be and should be interested.  They need to fix it or provide a solution for their customers.
Can you borrow an analog scope? If so, check your current trace and let us know what you find.
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209